2. music
  3. 162554-527

Paul McCartney 3

Not really a fan of his solo work, but heard some buzz about his newest album and gave it a listen when it was realeased a few days ago and am immersed. Not to the point of being a fanboi but definitely appreciative and happy listening both as a music lover and an audiophile (and yes, there is a difference).

Good songwriting and production from a genre god who does this for the love of it.

128x128simao
simao's avatar
simao OP
1,819 posts
 
I'll ask again: What exactly is the DR range?
csmgolf
887 posts
 
DR is dynamic range. If those numbers are accurate, there is a lot of compression going on in that recording.
roxy54's avatar
roxy54
7,977 posts
 
Everyone respects him so much from the Beatles days, and I completely understand that; but now it's like the king's new clothes. Nobody wants to say that his music is really weak. 
I've been there since the beginning of the Beatles, and I have no problem whatsoever with an artist exploring new sounds and changing styles; but to me, even the best of the Wings era was sort of silly and childish. Even the lyrics were embarrassing. But like I said, in the name of his past accomplishments, a lot of people feel bad about admitting that. 
three_easy_payments's avatar
three_easy_payments
2,097 posts
 
@roxy54   You apparently missed my post 2nd from the top. lol
jehowlind
18 posts
 
All the McCartney judges out there let me know how many worldwide classic rock songs you've written, recorded and had on the charts? Music is subjective always, but he is admittedly the greatest living musical artist of modern times. At 78, the man never sits still. Some of us will never get to see 78 yrs., let alone have the No.1 album on the charts.
More to discover