2. amps-preamps
  3. 162284-76532

Purifi Class D: Junk?

So, from the previous thread about high-end class D the Purifi module was brought up. I decided to get a cheap example from VTV, a simple stereo unit with a single Purifi module and matching Hypex SMPS. Standard input buffer. I got it in yesterday. First impression wasn't what I was expecting: weak, congested dynamics is what stood out to me. I expected greater expression through my ProAc D30Rs. The other problems such as poor soundstage, thin / boring character, etc, I marked up to needing burn-in before evaluating. So it's been 24 hours, I would still expect to get at least the high control / damping of high end class D and dynamic power, but it's just not present.

Could it be an impedance mismatch? Other manufacturers selling the Purifi with their custom input buffers are reporting 47k Ohms. VTV doesn't say in the manual or on the site. I checked the Purifi data sheet which reports...2.2k Ohms on SE???? That can't be right?? That's absurdly low! Am I reading the right spec? My preamp has an output impedance of 230 Ohms. Can someone confirm that the stock Purifi has this ultra-low input impedance?
madavid0
mrdecibel
3,063 posts
 
Using King Crimson's track to make a final evaluation ? Ridiculous. A very processed recording. Try the works of Tony Minasian. Reference quality demo material, for sure, then, make up your mind.
madavid0 OP
214 posts
 
I didn't use the King Crimson as the final arbiter, it's just that when I heard the VTV blur the chime percussions into a mess I got angry and decided I was done. I'll look into this Tony Minasian.

But, once again, I've been talked into trying something. I ordered a pair of input boards from VTV with Sparkos opamps. I do appreciate the speed of VTV's responses. If the defeault Hypex board is really that compromised I thought I should give it a fair shake in a configuration which is it supposed to use. I don't get why Purifi thought this thing sounded good enough to release to the public but...oh well. They're coming.
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 
If the defeault Hypex board is really that compromised
I’ve got those those Hypex buffer boards in my NC500 mono’s that have my own big linear supplies, there’s nothing wrong with the buffers (they don’t sound bad as some here would like you to believe) Your problem is elsewhere.

Saying that, my MSB discrete R2R dac has got volume control in the digital domain with up to 5v out balanced, and by-passing the Hypex buffers altogether and going direct from the MSB's balanced output into the balanced input of the NC500 modules, the sound took on a massive improvement in transparency/dynamics and slam.

(Moral of the story: Less is more, just like I always say with passive pre’s vs active pre’s also when possible)

Cheers George
ricevs
1,543 posts
 
"I don't get why Purifi thought this thing sounded good enough to release to the public"  What are you talking about?  You are not hearing a Purifi.....you are hearing a Purifi with a Hypex buffer put together by VTV.....The Purifi can use any buffer on its input.........a stock Hypex buffer board, a Purifi buffer board....a VTV buffer board with various different sounding discrete op amps....and then are mods to the input boards, mods to the input stages, mods to the Power supply, AC inlets, etc. etc......You really don' t seem to have any idea of what you are talking about.   
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 
a stock Hypex buffer board
There is nothing wrong with that buffer, Putzy's not an idiot to release a Hypex product that kind of bad sound ****
More to discover