The Sumiko fluxbuster is doing the exact same thing as the XLO and other CD demagnetizing tracks, only difference being the fluxbuster does this at millivolt level to avoid damaging the hair thin MC coils. Its all the same thing, and you can accomplish exactly the same thing by doing just like I said, playing the CD with variable output turned way down low. Zero difference. Save yourself a pile of money.
I’m curious whether anyone here has been using the devices that
deliberately expose the audio signal to a powerful magnetic field;
Yes, and you must have missed it lewm because its exactly what I said in my post above:
The other method I use regularly is the Radio Shack Bulk Tape Eraser.
Essentially just a really big powerful demagnetizer. Same as
demagnetizing tape heads, you bring it close then take it slowly away.
Use this on all the cables right up to the tone arm.
Another one:
I do not believe that
copper or silver wires become magnetized, but coils (as found in
cartridges and transformers, etc) do, to a tiny degree. I could be wrong
and would be happy to be corrected.
Pure copper and silver are not magnetic and do not become magnetized. Nothing however is absolutely pure. Any metallic impurities in the wire can become magnetized, and that is what we are targeting. There also seems to be something else going on. There is for example nothing to magnetize or demagnetize in a CD or LP, yet running a demagnetizer over them just before playing does indeed make a difference. No idea why. Just does.
The magnetic fields guide the electrons through the conductor in a more
efficient manner than with standard electrical conduction, creating
less distortion and interference. This new magnetic type of conduction
yada yada blah blah blah
There's nothing new about it. Synergistic Research Active Shielding wasn't new either. Don't know the whole history but apparently the idea was around a very long time before Ted got around to using it.
For some reason or other electricity is mysterious.
Electrons carry a charge and its this charge that is the signal not the physical electrons. The charge is an electromagnetic field. Its called electromagnetic because you can't have one without the other. Run a current through a wire and it generates a magnetic field around the wire. Run a wire through a magnetic field and it generates a current in the wire. Always. Everywhere. Step up transformers, step down transformers, electric motors, electric generators, MC and MM cartridges, starter solenoid on your car, junkyard electromagnet that erases laptops on Breaking Bad. We talk like these are all different things when they are all just the same.
I can see Krissy nodding her head, "So eloquent" she is thinking.
I wish. If only. ;)
If the signal was only in the wire then it wouldn't matter what we put around the wire. But it does. A lot. Teflon, air, what have you. Totally matters. But, why? People who don't know much say its "outside the signal path" so it can't matter. Right? That's what they say, right? Well they are wrong. Because remember, the signal is the field. The signal does not travel in the wire. The signal suffuses the wire, and a lot of the space around the wire too. Because its an electromagnetic field. It extends off into infinity. Its so strong in the wire we are able to pretend that's it. But it's not.
Synergistic Research took a wire mesh tube and put a very small 30V DC current on it. This generates an electromagnetic field that surrounds the cable. Works great. Its "outside the signal path" yet changes even to things as small as the diode in the power supply can easily be heard. So much for "outside the signal path"!
What is going on? How does this work?
The magnetic fields guide the electrons through the conductor in a more
efficient manner than with standard electrical conduction, creating
less distortion and interference. This new magnetic type of conduction yada yada blah blah blah
Good a story as any.