Does Age Matter?


Having read and contributed to several threads on the digital vs analog controversy I developed a nagging itch that suggested it is older people that prefer analog and younger people digital. If this is the case than there is most definitely a nostalgic element to that opinion. Perhaps we can answer that question. I will go first. Please do not ruminate on the differences. Age and preference, digital, analog or both! We'll tally the results at the end. 

I am 67 and like Both analog and digital.
128x128mijostyn
Both are great in their own way. The key is trying to find the good recordings on both that really make your system sing. I am 48 and have never had a preference it is the great recordings that matter no matter what technology they were on.
1++ @speakermaster and @gakertyd It is where the music is but I will tolerate a bad recording if the music is good. There are painfully few great recordings of Charlie Parker. We just have to live with the mediocre ones. Analog is a lot more fun until you get into digital signal processing.
You can do almost anything and it is like digital photography. No wasted film, you just erase your mistakes :-)
One thing I don’t understand, why people talking about digital like it’s something they do not have for free? 
You have to buy records and turntables, but digital is free even on your phone, streaming is free, there are so many sites anyone can find music for free (streaming in high quality, downloads if needed). Anyone can buy a DAC or even a portable DAC/headphone amp for very funny price. 
Digital cost nothing and all of us have it as a free bonus. If you prefer a fee bonus over real thing than who you are? 

You can’t sell digital the way you can sell analog (records). Anyone can copy your hard drive quickly.

Records cost money, shipping cost extra. Great records only getting more expensive. You can’t copy someone else’s record collection in one hour like you can do with anything digital. 

Collecting records is not about music on the background, it’s something else, and, as I can see, some people still don’t understand it. 

You can’t compare selection of tracks on Hard Drive to Real Record Collection!
@chakster , hey. It is not like that at all, at least not with me. I have been collecting records all my life and do not intend on stopping. But, I use digital processing to improve the performance of my system. Even my phono stage is digitized. Used correctly digital processing is a huge benefit. It is hard to get some people to understand that. Yes, I also collect digital files The music is great but I must say staring at my hard drive does not give me the pleasure of staring at my record collection.
Nothing can replace records. We can listen to digital, yes, so what?
The whole world is digital now, music is free in digital format, for most people it’s just something on background like radio. But not everyone is so lazy, record collecting was and always will be a hobby, a habit that you can’t get rid off, and it’s not just for music on background.

Even back in the day there was radio and records. Music on background provided by radio deejays from vinyl records was there (always), it was not necessary to buy records if you want just listen to something.

Streaming today is just like radio yesterday.

Discuss record collecting with people for whom radio is enough is a waste of time. It’s just completely different style. Vinyl is not about convenience, you need a room for it, time for it, money etc. But it’s about passion. When you have to pay for every record I think you will not buy some sh*t. But people can downloads tons of sh*t for free and they do (also stream it for free).