Maybe " all giant need to stand on the shoulder of a pygmy sometimes to see more»? Otherwise, it is a pygmy who will see more and giant will still see the same.
With a little imagination perhaps you could envision the possibility for the pygmy standing over the shoulder of the giant to SPEAK to him about what he sees?
Your proposition to correct me make no sense at all: A giant cannot stand on a pygmy without crushing him.....
My sentence have a context by the way, the context of an answering to a precise post and NOT directed to you....You cannot correct something out of a context....
I dont know if Groucho has a bad day, but glupson as usual?
it is the second correction i receive from you that is wrong in 24 hours...Please stay cautious....