Harbeth vs Vandersteen vs Sonner


Hello All. I am considering a new system and after listening to the Harbeth 30.2's with Rogue Electronics I thought I was sold. Recently, however, I heard the Sonner Legato Duo's and was quite impressed. Since the Sonners have been compared to the Vandersteen Cleo CT's I am now planning to give the Cleos a listen too. Is anyone in a position to comment on how these speakers compare?

128x128gsal
@denon1 My Sonus Fabers are the Olympica Nova I model.  I prefer my Harbeth 40.2A's over them but keep in mind the Harbeths cost 3X the price.  My 40.2's are in a room that's about 12' x 14', which is "supposed" to be too small of a space for the speakers, but I find the sound to be perfect for the space after tuning and tweaking.  
For your room size it really depends on your budget.  The 40 range of Harbeths will not be too much for your room, if not too much for your wallet.  If you can't go that high on your spend you should consider SHL5+ or 30.2's.  I used to own a pair of 30's and loved them.  I have never owned SHL5's but I have heard them in a store demo.  They sounded great.  
@audition__audio I have heard a few others say what you said about the lossy cabinet design of Harbeth, but in my experience you are in the minority.  I will say that there is no one speaker that will suit everyone's tastes (duh!), and this is a good thing.  I don't know your specific experience with Harbeth but it sounds like you don't like them.  I have found that they sound their best after proper match with amplifier, source components and cabling.  I think this is true for every speaker (probably), so it's no revelation what I'm saying, but unless you have owned a pair of Harbeths and have truly worked at getting the most from them I'd say you really haven't heard them in their best light. 
On the other hand, if you have experienced them fully and simply didn't like the sound, that's OK.  I just don't agree with the assessment that lossy cabinets are at fault.  The design is intentional, and right, and clearly this opinion is supported my legions of Harbeth loyalists.  I personally think B&W speakers sound very unimpressive, but clearly my opinion is wrong according to legions of loyal B&W fans, so I figure I haven't ever heard them in a proper setting.  The fun part about this hobby is comparing experiences that a wide and diverse group is having.  
Cheers,
Peter
@audioconnection gsal - awesome system, I have heard every single bit you mentioned ( except the Legacy sub ) all stellar by themselves and must make a hyper musical system. I will look at your system pics, but i am guessing some HRS isolation is next....
@tomic601 ,
Great point.
I put my preamp and subs on Townshend platforms and bars.
IMHO, it 'tightened' up the sound, especially the bass.-Just a clearer/cleaner sound.
I want to add some Pods to my monoblocks, but they are so dang heavy...

And, to throw fat to the fire.
The new AQ power cords are really something. John Rutan recommends starting with Source and working your way down.

Bob
Mudbone - I see from a  prior post that you owned the Rethm Braava as well. I've heard both the Braava and the Sonner Legato (Unum, not the Duo) at the NY Audio Show and CAF and found them to be very different in their presentation. The Braava threw a huge soundstage but sounded slightly soft on transients and rolled off on the top end, the Sonner more dynamic and a bit bright and less full in the midrange. I also heard the Sonner Allegro with a SET amp with a similar sonic signature. Does this match up to your experience with these two? Also, did you compare the Sonner  Duo with the Unum? It would seem reasonable that with the additional bass driver and larger cabinet that the Duo would have a more fleshed out mid and lower bass response.