Albertporter, nothing would make me happier to have you living close by.
When is digital going to get the soul of music?
I have to ask this(actually, I thought I mentioned this in another thread.). It's been at least 25 years of digital. The equivalent in vinyl is 1975. I am currently listening to a pre-1975 album. It conveys the soul of music. Although digital may be more detailed, and even gives more detail than analog does(in a way), when will it convey the soul of music. This has escaped digital, as far as I can tell.
- ...
- 835 posts total
Muralman1, I think we have a misunderstanding; I am talking about digital not analog. Here is a description of the Reference Recordings HRx discs And here is the Rachmaninoff Symphonic Dances HRx disc I have converted this to Linear PCM 176.4/24 DVD-A using HD-Audio Solo Ultra by Cirlinca so I can play it in my NWO-M. As nice as the CD is, the HRx/DVD-A is light years better. Both came from the same master tape. Best, Alex Peychev |
Data volumes and available bandwidth of many home digital systems and associated higher costs is still a major barrier for large scale application of high res digital. It will continue get better over time. Source material may still be limited, but it is possible for one to implement high res digital in their home systems today if really desired, but the cost will be high and overall utility to users will be lower in most every aspect save perhaps the one that matters most to audiophiles: sound quality. mp3 and other compressed formats are not a conspiracy against good sound as many expound, but more of a practical compromise that helps enable greater value to the masses overall. Sound quality is just one thing that most factor into their buying decisions. |
- 835 posts total