Disappointment with Pass Labs - I'm looking for something else


Hello, I am new to this forum and my mother tongue is not English, so please forgive me if I make mistakes as I use a translator.

I recently bought an XA30.8 and an XP12. I was very happy but as time went by I began to not feel comfortable with the sound.
After doing many tests, I find that the XA30.8 sounds very very sweet but actually too much. I find it to be a loosely defined amp, somewhat muddy and lacks a lot of air and grip. The soundstage is very closed.

The XP-12 is the worst of the two. It is a previous that removes a lot of resolution and information, without transient attacks and sunken mid frequencies. Instead it brings warmth.

Has anyone of you found the same?

If you ask me, I have a Klipsch Cornwall and a dCS BArtok.

Now I want a capable amp, forceful, something warm, decisive, airy and with a great soundstage.

At first I thought of changing my XA30.8 for X250.8, and changing the XP-12 for a second-hand Audio Research Ref5. I am afraid of this change and continue with Pass, since I can go back to the same thing a bit.

On the other hand I have thought of going for a Luxman 900 combo, since it has very good reviews and from what I have read it could be the winning ticket.
opm
I have Crites speakers which are quite similar in sound and setup to the Cornwall IV.  I use the Pass XA25 and find it to be quite neutral sounding, dynamic and great imaging.  I don't use a preamp. The 25 does not have 2nd harmonic distortion voiced into the amp.  This could be what you are hearing.  Also, I spent months positioning the speakers.  But it ended up being quite simple.  Point them so a line directly from center of each speaker intersects about 12 inches behind your head(not exact)  I also used the Vandersteen setup method.  This makes sure your speakers are not the same distance from the side wall as they are from the back wall to minimize phase and comb filtering.  I then had to add bass traps and diffusion panels.  This will really clean up imaging and bass definition.  Sub woofers can also open up the mid range. 

I did not care for tubes.    Muddy bass. 

I too wonder which preamp works good with this setup.  A tube preamp is often used but I would be asking which one just like you.  I am not sure a preamp would make my system sound better or not. 

I hate to see you start over.  It is frustrating and lots of work.  I see Ayre, Luxman, Accuphase and Sugden as solid state alternatives.  Based on reviews even expensive SS amps can sound too dry and clinical if you're not careful.  These alternatives I have listed would be Class A with a warmer presentation.    You do not need a big amp to drive these speakers.  The 30.8 actually puts out well over 100 watts and will break your eardrums before you break the speakers.  LOL


Yes, I know.

Another option is to see how the XA30.8 behaves when it comes out of Class A to go to A / B if I decide to switch from much less efficient speakers. I don't know if I read one day that Nelson commented that he went from accentuating the second harmonic to the third. Nor do I know if it will sound more forceful. I doubt it.
Yes, it is true that Klipsch are not high definition speakers. but this should not hide that the XA30.8 has a forcefulness problem and especially the XP12 have a resolution problem.
I read through the whole thing, LOL, NOW I'm 100% convinced.
OP Knows, that's why he ask! Must be tough to know the WRONG answer..

Starting over is a hard thing to hear.. Even if it is the answer..

45 years ago, I was like that.. I was in my 20's LOL.
So was Nelson Pass. Just kids... NOW he just laughs all the way to the bank..

I think the problem is OP bought Pass because it has a good reputation, NOT because it was a good match. He bought Klipsch, because it had a good reputation.

BUT nowhere did the OP read that the TWO go together.

In other word, TWO rights won't fix a wrong..

So I Quote "YES, I KNOW"

I wish you the best, BUT learning shouldn't cost, it should pay.

Regards