Morch DP-8 arm on a Helix Two turntable

Thanks, D. I have a DV501 (given to me by a dear departed friend) and two DV505s. Only one DV, one of the DV505s, is in constant use on my much tweaked Lenco.  I prefer it to the 501 because of easier VTA adjustment, although I do know that many favor the 501 over the 505 for pure SQ. (On that table, I  change cartridges a lot, and I hate the "grub screw" method of securing VTA vis the 501.)  My question, for anyone, is that since the argument for high effective mass in the horizontal plane makes so much sense (to me), I have to wonder what is the counter-argument in favor of equalizing or nearly equalizing effective mass in the horizontal and the vertical.  Fremer seems  to favor that approach but I have never seen a convincing argument for it.  I have an FR64S on my Victor TT101, but all my other tonearms are of the conventional type; no special effort is made to increase horizontal mass over vertical mass.

@lewm 
Fyi - the VTA adjustable collar from the 507 fits the 501.
I actually have a couple of them. You might be able to buy one from the Dynavector agent.

@dover I do have a custom phono cable that I use with my DP-6, I’m actually quite satisfied with its performance which is the reason I’m considering the DP-8. Which table and Morch arm tube did you use, I favor the heavy blue dot.

@scar972 

I set the Moerch up on a heavily modded Garrard 401, Blue 12" arm tube with a van den hul Colibri. The effective mass was just within the range specified by van den hul for the Colibri. The Red was too light for the Colibri. Overall sound was very good, very clean and crisp.

Nice! I too have Garrard 401 but with a Schick tonearm. Thank you for the info on the DP-8.