The Absolute Sound vs Pleasing Sound


I have changed my mind about this over the years. The absolute sound (closest to real live music) just can't be accomplished even though I have heard some spectacular systems that get close on some music. So years ago I changed my system to give me the sound I wanted. I'm much happier now and all my music collection can be enjoyed for what it is: Recorded music.  
128x128russ69
Wasn't that test about how audience hears it and not how the player feels while playing it? In any case, we can say there is too many variables and avoid going into the abyss of what is right.

Violins are slowly getting extinct and music these days depends on integrated circuits, resistors, and other things in similar direction rather than on a craftsman trying to surpass Guarneri. Same goes for the piano stores. Dwindling and dwindling for a reason. As sad as all of that may be. Once upon a time, harpsichord was a big thing, too.
What's sad is how some people either refuse  or can't seem to grasp how biases influence human behavior. The violin test was just an example of how these biases affect each of us no matter how well we think we're immune. At least
" Fritz" understood and shrugged, knowing he's human without twisting himself into a logical pretzel. 
**** Wasn’t that test about how audience hears it and not how the player feels while playing it? ****

It was both; the article made that clear. Perhaps I was not clear in what I wrote; although I feel I am just repeating myself:

When a player first picks up an instrument (new or old), the feeling created is a major contributor to the resulting sound. If the instrument feels free and non-resistant, easier to play, the resulting sound could very well be a more appealing sound to some listeners as the player feels and sounds more at ease and can, in fact, coax a pleasant tone out of the instrument. However, this is often also a limitation. If the instrument is more resistant and offers the player more “fight”, as is the case with many antique instruments, the ultimately superior sound of the instrument will not manifest itself until the player has had a considerable amount of time with the instrument; much more than is the case in a typical blind test. This is a good thing and a quality sought out by many players.

This concept may be difficult to grasp for a non instrumentalist, but it is reality and is the reason that those old instruments are held in such high esteem. There is more potential in store.

**** What’s sad is how some people either refuse or can’t seem to grasp how biases influence human behavior. ****

It is true that biases exist, but this does not negate what I described. What is even sadder, IMO, is to be locked in a mindset that says that reactions are the result of bias and to refuse to be open minded about the possibility that it is not bias at all that is at play. Seems to me, that the person who is enlightened enough to understand bias should also be the one most open to the possibility that it is NOT always bias that is at play.

There has been a trend in the world of instrument making (all instruments, not just strings) to produce instruments that are brilliant, faster and more incisive sounding; not surprising, considering the similarly changing aesthetic sensibilities of our modern society. Many of the vintage instruments are held in high esteem and sought out by great players for their complexity and richness of tone, and other subtle and elusive qualities. They offer greater potential to a great player.