If you don't have a wide sweet spot, are you really an audiophile?


Hi, it’s me, professional audio troll. I’ve been thinking about something as my new home listening room comes together:

The glory of having a wide sweet spot.

We focus far too much on the dentist chair type of listener experience. A sound which is truly superb only in one location. Then we try to optimize everything exactly in that virtual shoebox we keep our heads in. How many of us look for and optimize our listening experience to have a wide sweet spot instead?

I am reminded of listening to the Magico S1 Mk II speakers. While not flawless one thing they do exceptionally well is, in a good room, provide a very good, stable stereo image across almost any reasonable listening location. Revel’s also do this. There’s no sudden feeling of the image clicking when you are exactly equidistant from the two speakers. The image is good and very stable. Even directly in front of one speaker you can still get a sense of what is in the center and opposite sides. You don’t really notice a loss of focus when off axis like you can in so many setups.

Compare and contrast this with the opposite extreme, Sanders' ESL’s, which are OK off axis but when you are sitting in the right spot you suddenly feel like you are wearing headphones. The situation is very binary. You are either in the sweet spot or you are not.

From now on I’m declaring that I’m going all-in on wide-sweet spot listening. Being able to relax on one side of the couch or another, or meander around the house while enjoying great sounding music is a luxury we should all attempt to recreate.
erik_squires
You may feel your response is erudite, but to me, you just told me "I like Oranges", after I told you it was 7 below freezing and snowing outside. Perhaps to you there was some correlation, but I am just shaking my head and I suspect others are too at this point.
Insulting is your only argument...

i just put a simple point here you never answer to it...

Any reader can read that for himself...

I will simplify my post for your own understanding...



Acoustic explain imaging.....Engineereing use the acoustical explanation for better recording technique...

yes toe in speakers matter and anything pertaining to timing and volume...

BUT timing of wavefront matter MOST because it is ACOUSTIC science first... It is the same thing for the concept of timbre which is acoustical one...

This was my point...






How in the world this simple fact which is totally true correspond to you answer about orange and freezing...

You are a very intelligent person, but you are not a very "gentle" and very trustfull one sorry...




audio2design
If you worked better on your reading comprehension and spent more time trying to understand what I wrote, and less time trying to prove me and others wrong ...
Ad hominem attacks are a basic logical fallacy. You are literally not making sense.

I am pretty sure that English is not @mahgister’s native language - yet his reading comprehension seems fine to me even if there’s an occasional stumble. I think he should be welcome here. Under the forum rules, he deserves to participate here without your attacks.
I never attacked people here save those who attack me first...

He bashed all people owning turntables and all audiophiles from day one....

He is without shame.... And even blatently wrong go on posting like if nothing happen...

I am amazed...

I just want to rectify your post, he attack all audiophiles, not me specifically... He does not hate me, he despise all audiophiles or even musicians....

I never took his attack so much  personal, like some other people did....He hate what he estimate being ignorant people thats all... It is only a professional  hating so to speak....He is completely programmed by his working job and dont understand science outside of his simplest protocols...

Biases for him must be eliminated thats all, like pest for an extaerminator, he dont even know the "scientific" exact nethodological definition of "bias" and i proved with his own post, next to  the scientific standard definition of it ...He never admit being wrong... It is pathetical....



Post removed 
Post removed