Easy peasy.. Hypex NC500 will drive them no problem.. If they are wired at 2 ohm, no idea on that one. I wouldn't, especially for a full range speaker.. limits the choices.
That is a class d amp speaker plain and simple.. 2 ohm stable A/B way to expensive. Class d for sure.. 1000.00 will drive the neighbors out for sure.. BUT 2 ohm? WAY to much distortion and the lower you go the higher it goes.. 8-16 ohms is still preferred for mids and highs..
Especially valve amps.. Night and day on small planars or ribbons when they are driven at 4 opposed to 16 ohms.. Just very clean at 16 ohms..
The tech side is "better bandwidth". The same reason I like valves for low mids, mids and highs.. They just work better there..
98% what on earth are they used for PA? How do you get 98% domes?
You better not have ANY noise in a system... That is really pushing it..
I think the 98% is a bit hype... I'd have to see the numbers on that one and how they came up with them.. They just don't work...
With todays amps and the headroom available for the dollars.. WHY? 2 ohms?
Regards
That is a class d amp speaker plain and simple.. 2 ohm stable A/B way to expensive. Class d for sure.. 1000.00 will drive the neighbors out for sure.. BUT 2 ohm? WAY to much distortion and the lower you go the higher it goes.. 8-16 ohms is still preferred for mids and highs..
Especially valve amps.. Night and day on small planars or ribbons when they are driven at 4 opposed to 16 ohms.. Just very clean at 16 ohms..
The tech side is "better bandwidth". The same reason I like valves for low mids, mids and highs.. They just work better there..
98% what on earth are they used for PA? How do you get 98% domes?
You better not have ANY noise in a system... That is really pushing it..
I think the 98% is a bit hype... I'd have to see the numbers on that one and how they came up with them.. They just don't work...
With todays amps and the headroom available for the dollars.. WHY? 2 ohms?
Regards