"The 'rush' could be disconcerting...."
The 'rush' on this thread is disconcerting, indeed.
when the herb kicked in and your rig sounds perfect
wolf_garcia, I am concerned that your denial of what is easily Googled, may be an indication of an underlying issue: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33464286/ While there are other studies, smaller in nature that suggest Cannabis is simply an indicator or other issues, many other studies have concluded otherwise, hence to claim that "There are simply zero reliable "longitudinal studies" showing increased death from cannabis use...none. Period." is troubling. I clearly said that 25% of users (regular) exhibited some sort of problem, which does not mean addicted. Somewhere around 10% of regular users are identified to have a problematic dependency and 2% to have what would be identified as a chemical addiction. |
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33464286/ 204 780 study subjects. Now, that is something even for retrospective study. |
I am not inclined to tell adults what to do when the only person they are hurting is themselves. We do have a duty of care to our children though, so promoting false information about dangers is breaking that duty of care, especially given the significant body of evidence forming that Cannabis use can cause developmental damage in growing brains, made worse where a predisposition to a mental health issue already exists. We know now that the brain keeps developing till about the age of 25, so caution is a more intelligent course of behavior. |