AQ Blizzard or Thunder?


  1. I recently added an AudioQuest Niagara 1200 line conditioner at the front of my headphone system. Presently I’m using an AQ Blizzard power cable for the 1200. Would stepping up to an AQ Thunder power cable for the Niagara make any difference at all in the SQ(sound quality) of my listening chain? Thanks

128x128adasdad
vinylshadow, why should I sell my AQ Niagara 1200 line conditioner and get one from P.I. Audio? https://piaudiogroup.com/
No problems with my Thunder....pitch black back grounds. Using cable as is with dbs. Great cable. The x3 is also great for source components, using 3 of those. All plugged into my niagara 1200 which is plugged into my nrg Edison outlet. 12 gauge 20A dedicated circuit.
audioguy85, thank you for your comment. I think on Monday that I’m going to give the AQ Thunder power cable a try in my headphone system. 
So the Thunder is designed for high current applications such as power conditioners and amps. The Blizzard is multi purpose and can  be used for High Current & source components. The thunder is solid core strands vs concentric packing. I am not an engineer & I don't believe that measurements alone can tell you what a cable sounds like. I do believe in design application so the Thunder would be the correct choice for your Niagara. I would suggest finding a dealer that uses a Thunder for demo & see if they would sell it to you on loan to try it out & listen for yourself if that is possible. 
jb1, thanks for the input. I’m in a good position because I’ve been buying audio gear from the same guy since I was a sophomore in college in 1976. He takes really good care of me, and I keep him in business. 😊