NOLA Boxers in my space


So I picked up a pair of new NOLA Boxers undemoed because a) the price was right and b) they were piano black instead of that (for me) kinda garish cherry.

For years, it's been my blasphemous contention that speakers are going to be right as long as everything upstream is right. So I'd rather have an excellent front end and okay speakers, than great speakers hitched to an okay front end.

I have been gradually downsizing my system, and had Carver Amazing Platinums for almost 20 years, so am intimately familiar with the magic of that big sucker. Got the NOLAs, put them on some Dynaudio stands (the Stand 3, their most attractive one), and sat down to listen.

Rest of the system, by the by: First Sound Reference passive, PS Audio 250 Delta monos, Sony XA20 ES CD player. Didn't have a chance to hear them with my (now gone) Maplenoll Ariadne, but have a Thorens 2030 coming that I am very interested in hearing with them. (Will be putting a Grado Reference Sonata on).

I don't do a lot of audiophile talk but tonally, they were almost identical to the Carvers, which kinda didn't surprise me. The Carvers had a much bigger image, of course, because they're the size of a door, right? But once you remove the extremes from consideration (the Carvers go higher up and down), the heart of the music is, tonally, the same. This is good, because it means that the speakers aren't adding a lot to what you hear, just doing the window thing.

Even brand new (I still have less than 20 hours on them), imaging is pinpoint, actually better than the Carvers, which tended to present immense pictures that weren't all that precise, like Gerhard Richter, for you visual arts nerds. Image specificity is very good, and there isn't any of that box sound that I used to find so annoying in box speakers. The soundstage just sits there as the speakers vanish.

And this is, mind you, in a room that isn't at all set up. I just unboxed them, plopped 'em on the stands, placed them about 6 feet apart and firing straight ahead.

I don't really believe in audiophile recordings, but one disc I live a lot is "Flight of the Behemoth," by Sunn ))), and the track "Mocking Solemnity" in particular. It's a monstrous thing, as Sunn believe in the power of high-volume, low frequency sonics, presented as a big, multilayered, glorious drone. Most importantly, their stuff has bass galore.

No, the NOLAs weren't the equal of the 4 12-inch woofers per side on the Carvers, but there wasn't any real LACK of bass either. The sense of the song's immensity was present, along with the glorious atmospherics. Ran through some favorite jazz and classical discs, and the tonal qualities were preserved. And Bjork, in particular "Pagan Poetry" from "Vespertine" is a lush tapestry of sonic artifice. There's all kinds of stuff going on, and the NOLAs lay it all out there, while making Bjork's voice sound as glorious as it should. No tizz, no glare, no teeth-gritting artifacts.

These little babies strike me as very musical and neutral, which doesn't surprise me. I know that (retail) $1500 is cheap in audiophile land, but you can design an excellent two-way bookshelf speaker for that price. NOLA have certainly done so. For me, they're keepers.

Just wanted to put something up, for folks who might be wanting to know how these things work in the real world. Thanks for reading.
kevvwill
Not to derail this thread (I like Nola Boxers BTW) - my heart sank when I head PJ Harvey's latest album. Bjork's album isn't as bad, but it's not happenin' either...

I threw up in my mouth when I saw that ToneAudio put PJ Harevey's album as one of the best of the year - actually just about everything they listed is pretty terrible...
I know, right? And it isn't even that it isn't what PJ Harvey has done before. It just isn't good. I love the fact that she and Bjork don't sit still, creatively, but be good, dangit!

Speaking of PJ, if you don't have the "Rid Of Me" demos recording, it's worth tracking down. There's some pretty amazing, raw musicmaking on that one.
To get back to the essence of the thread, I am exactly where you are. I have been in this hobby/obsession for more than 30 years. I started with Tymponys and have had everything from those to B&W to Apogees.

I have had the Boxers for only one week, but find them incredibly accurate. They lack bass and an REL sub is definitely in my immediate future. They image far better than anything else I have owned, at ten times the price.

My listening room is not big and I understand that in a larger setting, I would not be as happy. I also have fairly good electronics. Leave it to say these are an incredible value at $1500.
You will find, Dmm53, that they break in rather nicely. I have about 50 hours on mine, and they're getting even better. Smoother, mostly, and I have never had a speaker disappear so completely. What a little gem.

I must say that I don't feel the need for a sub, though, which is good because aesthetically, that isn't an option for me. I'm finding the bass very satisfying, even as I realize it's never going to reproduce an earthquake. I wonder if the power that I'm feeding them has something to do with that? The 250 Deltas are bass monsters, for sure.

Glad you like them. The Boxers strike me as one of those rare audiophile products that's underpriced, and deserve consideration, irrespective of that loaded "for the money" qualifier.
I am extremely interested in these Nola Boxers and have been for a while now. Kev and Dm's comments only further my intrigue. Does anyone have any experience comparing them to the Master Merlin TSM-Mmi's?