MQA is for chumps


fuzztone
@fuzztone 

Thank you for the very thorough investigation and your perseverance in doing this. For me any technology that cannot be explained in scientific terms ("folding" a digital file describes more something like magic rather than science) and does not allow independent reviewers to test it, smells like a scam to me.
Now I can see from your analysis the proof why MQA never sounded that good to me...
Fuzztone -- I don't feel any anger over the fact I forked over a few bucks for an MQA license fee. I took my chances.  I paid my money with open eyes. To me it's the equivalent of tube-rolling. It can take a good deal of time to find if you really do, say, prefer  EL-34s over 6550's.
Did not watch your video but as I read MQA is for providers not consumers. If true I give it a big FU!

I can just add that Qobuz is not even available where I live, hence I use Tidal. It does sound a lot better than Spotify. When Spotify starts with high rez music I will probably switch to that.
More to discover