What do we hear when we change the direction of a wire?
I remember reading in 1976 in French ,the first edition, the" fractal objects" of Mandelbrot and all the book was about measuring in a way... The first chapter was: How to measure brittany coast... One of the most beautiful book i read... The book became legendary after that, a milestone in science.... |
The ancient Greeks believed the Earth was a sphere and measured it. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200606/history.cfm#:~:text=240%20B.C.%20Eratosthenes%20Meas.... |
However a bunch of anti-science people fought tooth and nail to prevent the acceptance of reality. geddit?His point was not about "subjectivist/objectivist" stupid audio thread wars, it was about the necessity to know what parameters to measure and how they correlate to phenomena before and after the measuring process; Eratosthene was in ptolemaic dynastical Egypt Alexandria library one of the rare people able to understand Archimedes.... Till the times of Galileo almost all people think flat earth... Geddit! |
His point was false. He was trying to say we were weren't or couldn't measure the right thing, hence believed the Earth was flat. That is flat out wrong, pun intended. We absolutely had the ability to measure and prove the earth was not flat. It was almost exclusively the force of religion that attempted to prevent science from communicating the truth so that their preferred lie could remain true. Geddit? |
His point was false. He was trying to say we were weren't or couldn't measure the right thing, hence believed the Earth was flat.If you read what i say about the measuring process you will not neded to use "religion" wars against the alleged "subjectivist" opponent... I dont embark in stupidity like objectivist versus objectivist, with the subjectivist being the ignorant religious zealot... This is plain stupidity argument between two blind opponents.... I apologize sincerely to say that to you.... We cannot measure something without knowing what to measure.... Not only that we can measure something with the wrong measuring tool....We can also erase a phenomena trying to measure it in the wrong way... I read his post meaning only that: " it was about the necessity to know what parameters to measure and how they correlate to phenomena before and after the measuring process " This was my interpretation out of the subjectivist/objectivist dead end road... Do you want to stay in this dead end with your opponent? Not me.... Thanks.... « Measure process is more complex than meet the eyes»-Anonymus Smith |
