His point was false. He was trying to say we were weren't or couldn't measure the right thing, hence believed the Earth was flat.If you read what i say about the measuring process you will not neded to use "religion" wars against the alleged "subjectivist" opponent...
I dont embark in stupidity like objectivist versus objectivist, with the subjectivist being the ignorant religious zealot...
This is plain stupidity argument between two blind opponents....
I apologize sincerely to say that to you....
We cannot measure something without knowing what to measure.... Not only that we can measure something with the wrong measuring tool....We can also erase a phenomena trying to measure it in the wrong way...
I read his post meaning only that: " it was about the necessity to know what parameters to measure and how they correlate to phenomena before and after the measuring process "
This was my interpretation out of the subjectivist/objectivist dead end road...
Do you want to stay in this dead end with your opponent?
Not me.... Thanks....
« Measure process is more complex than meet the eyes»-Anonymus Smith