Rotel RA-1592 vs McIntosh MA252 on B&W 702 s2


I was offered a trade in on the McIntosh MA252 for 3k so they are both a comparable price. the Rotel is 200W per channel and the McIntosh is 100W per channel but I have been told the McIntosh pushes way above its weight. Which is better for my speakers since they are fairly power hungry? I am also using them for Home Theater and really want to get as much volume and deep bass as I can out of them. Thanks!
km1181
"McIntosh punches above it's weight" is really just an opinion.  In reality, they are going to have different sonic signatures.  The McIntosh will have a more mild and laid back kind of sound, but it will have a more neutral sonic signature.  The Rotel will have more excitement and will definitely NOT be as laid back, but it has a slightly warm texture/feel to the sound. 

Since home theater bass is important, I would likely go with the more powerful Rotel which has a larger transformer and power supply.  This will give you more deep bass muscle/strength.
About 20 years ago, I thoroughly tested the amplifiers for B&W. For an average price, Rotel B&W was the best choice. The models have changed, but the nature of the components has not changed. For the children's homes, I deliberately chose the Rotel RA-1592 mk2 & B&W 702 Signature. I hope this helps.
The MKll version of the Rotel RA-1592 was compared to the K1Ruby integrated from Marantz.
https://hometheaterreview.com/rotel-ra-1572-integrated-amplifier-review/
And, this one liked it better than the Yamaha A-S1200
https://www.stereo.net.au/reviews/rotel-ra-1572-mkii-integrated-amplifier-review
Hope that helps.

All the best,
Nonoise