I have to repeat: Essien refers to a lot of authoritative opinions, and you just reduce all their thoughts to zero without doubt. Whose words are silly then?Essien if he is right, proves with experiments very simple one by the way, that all the research enebriated by his technological success has never been able to solve the hearing problem because of the false assumptions that the brain is a computer and that pitch is in some way reducible to frequency....
But if there is a mechanical very concrete forgotten factor at the source and production of sound and if the air is only the vector of the sound image not of this sound body, then what is sound?
Sound is no more what we think it was...and the ears is not linked to a brain wich would be mainly a computer...
I will say no more i just received the book....
In my opinion, doing double or triple-blind tests with something that’s an acquired taste won’t provide scientifically sound results.Wise! This acquired taste is often a new learning habit also whose exercice takes place like you already said yourself, in a controlled room or space or at least a relaxing environment like a long month camp holiday....
Science has almost nothing to do with blindtest...The industrial process has all to do with it....Standardization and controls are the key words related to blindtest with statistic....And this is at best.... After that it is a useless James Randi Show....