2. amps-preamps
  3. 166178-1009

Manual preamp volume control - Audible Illusions M3B

Is it true that most preamps with remote control have a lot to do with their sound quality?
Do vintage preamps with manual precision volume control have the inherent advantage over modern preamps with remote control?
After a few months of mulling over preamp upgrade, I took a plunge on Audible Illusions M3B preamp after reading some posts on the advantage of manual volume control over remote.
Some, including Michael Fremer, considered AI M3A was one of the best preamp.
" All of this adds up to what is clearly one of the finest-sounding, best-built full-function preamplifiers in the world—and the reviews from around the world reflect that."
https://www.stereophile.com/tubepreamps/316/index.html

M3B is considered much better than M3A. AI still produces M3B (preamp with MM phono) and M3B MC (phono for low output) with no remote control.
If the answer to my two questions are true, when most super charged audiophiles search for holy grails, why they choose preamps with remote control over those with manual control, and prefer convenience over sound quality?


128x128ihcho
artemus_5's avatar
artemus_5
1,930 posts
 
CJ is well known for their preamps. Their top of the line GAT has a remote. I doubt them or any good Mfg would use remotes  if they were inferior
ihcho's avatar
ihcho OP
612 posts
 
Well, then the answers to my questions are No and No?
stereo5's avatar
stereo5
6,388 posts
 
I went from a Modulus 3B to a McIntosh tube preamp for 3 reasons. First was customer service from AI is almost non-existence and as Art Ferris is way up there in age, I worried what would happen when he passes. Second was I am getting very lazy in my old age and wanted a full function tube preamp with a remote. Third was I had a Modulus 3 and a 3A before the 3B and was tired of the AI and wanted to try a different brand.
More to discover