What do we hear when we change the direction of a wire?


Douglas Self wrote a devastating article about audio anomalies back in 1988. With all the necessary knowledge and measuring tools, he did not detect any supposedly audible changes in the electrical signal. Self and his colleagues were sure that they had proved the absence of anomalies in audio, but over the past 30 years, audio anomalies have not disappeared anywhere, at the same time the authority of science in the field of audio has increasingly become questioned. It's hard to believe, but science still cannot clearly answer the question of what electricity is and what sound is! (see article by A.J.Essien).

For your information: to make sure that no potentially audible changes in the electrical signal occur when we apply any "audio magic" to our gear, no super equipment is needed. The smallest step-change in amplitude that can be detected by ear is about 0.3dB for a pure tone. In more realistic situations it is 0.5 to 1.0dB'". This is about a 10% change. (Harris J.D.). At medium volume, the voltage amplitude at the output of the amplifier is approximately 10 volts, which means that the smallest audible difference in sound will be noticeable when the output voltage changes to 1 volt. Such an error is impossible not to notice even using a conventional voltmeter, but Self and his colleagues performed much more accurate measurements, including ones made directly on the music signal using Baxandall subtraction technique - they found no error even at this highest level.

As a result, we are faced with an apparently unsolvable problem: those of us who do not hear the sound of wires, relying on the authority of scientists, claim that audio anomalies are BS. However, people who confidently perceive this component of sound are forced to make another, the only possible conclusion in this situation: the electrical and acoustic signals contain some additional signal(s) that are still unknown to science, and which we perceive with a certain sixth sense.

If there are no electrical changes in the signal, then there are no acoustic changes, respectively, hearing does not participate in the perception of anomalies. What other options can there be?

Regards.
anton_stepichev
Mahgister, you are just making excuses.
It is not me ....it is you who are not interested by any discussion...

You hide yourself behind this blindtest idea... HE DOES NOT SELL CABLE...

Is it clear to read in big letters?

He give all instruction to test his idea on his site...

You insult him like a cable peddler...

Maybe he is wrong, but this is not possible to say without understanding his motivation and recreate his experiment...

Try his experiment dont insult him without listening or discussing...

This is an interesting thread not about the usual trivialities or audiophile marketing ideas or stupid branded name product boasting.... I dont need audio product i am interested in ideas....

This is not ABOUT CABLES......

This about other ideas in audio and wiring.... And sound.....




Then he shouldn't have asked for alternative options.

If there are no electrical changes in the signal, then there are no acoustic changes, respectively, hearing does not participate in the perception of anomalies. What other options can there be?
I wasn't  questioning his cables but his conclusions drawn from his test. He asked for another option , I gave him one. Scientists don't take it personal they would do the testing to show my alternate conclusion is wrong. That's how it works. 
He is not here to satisfy your desire for a test on the spot....It is not Ted Denney to whom you could ask for a cable...

By God! are you intelligent?

test yourself his ideas are open there to be read by anybody...

HE DOES NOT COME TO SELL BUT TO DISCUSS... with intelligent people not narrow mind who will assimilate him to a peddler...

I am flabbergasted by, how can i call that respectfully?

narrowness of mind.....

 Ok pass a good night i will go out before being out of my bound...


I didn't make a claim I simply gave an alternate  conclusion to the claim there wasn't one. It isn't incumbent on me to prove or disprove anything that's up to the claimant.  I didn't claim 
 
at the same time the authority of science in the field of audio has increasingly become questioned
which is nonsense, if anything there's a resurgence. 

I didn't claim there's an unknown signal in the audio signal that humans perceive with a sixth sense. 

electrical and acoustic signals contain some additional signal(s) that are still unknown to science, and which we perceive with a certain sixth sense.

If this signal is unknown to science how does he know it's there? 


at the same time the authority of science in the field of audio has increasingly become questioned


Audioholics on Youtube has 150,000 followers


There are probably 10x the posts on ASR as there are here, and way way more useful information for actual audiophiles.  People actually refer to ASR. 


Many of the consumer audio companies sell as much stuff as the whole high end market.