2. cables
  3. 166352-155632

Do no harm to a signal! Does this mean.....

So basic cables are harming the precious delicate analogue signal as it approaches a speaker.  

and how to avoid?  
Isnt this the reason for paying up for cables cause,its so hard to limit signal damage? Not about improving signal. So much damage going on.  

never dreamed how much i was harming the signal.  Does all this make sense???


jumia
djones51
4,947 posts
 
No.
artemus_5's avatar
artemus_5
1,917 posts
 
Isnt this the reason for paying up for cables cause,its so hard to limit signal damage?
No That’s why it makes no sense! False premise.

So why post false premises? What does it add? You posted a good question about how much to spend on cables and then post this supposed "GOTCHA" as if this false premise  is the overall belief of everyone who has upgraded cables. 

dletch2
455 posts
 
No.


Ask anyone who is making that claim, to quantify the claim. It is best to step back to avoid the flailing hand waving at this point. "Trust your ears" never means "Trust your ears". It usually means, use your ears, but trust your eyes.  Almost as a rule, anyone who makes the statement, "Trust your ears", never trusts their own ears. That is why they never blind test. 


Virtually every claim made by a cable manufacturer about what their cable does is easily proven with current measurement technology. Ask yourself why they never do.
More to discover