If we have to leave out basic science like blind listening tests let's also not delve into psuedo science "sixth sense" and unknown signals.
So, we can't have placebo or imaginary signals or an unknown sixth sense. The answer is, it doesn't exist.
What do we hear when we change the direction of a wire?
At least we're getting closer to why everything sounds better at night in complete darkness: https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-captured-the-first-ever-image-of-an-electron-s-orbit-in... Besides, every particle resonates: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance Can two cables even be the same? Is there a way to create an exact atomic structure, either left to right or right to left. What if you go to a deeper level than electrons? What if with time the structure aligns in a certain direction due to the constant flow and excitement of the particles? I think there's more to it than pure electrical signal that we can measure. Just some thoughts |
djones51 Wait. I gave a specific, logical reason why it is impossible to rely on a blind test in such a situation, and not just stated that "we have to leave out basic science like blind listening tests". I expected you to criticize the logic, not just say, "The answer is, it doesn't exist." |
I’m sorry I can’t come up with a logical reason why we should believe in a sixth sense or if there are unknown signals in wires. I don’t even know where to criticize the ... I hesitate to say logic? That’s your conclusion isn’t it? additional signal(s) that are still unknown to science, and which we perceive with a certain sixth sense. |
djones51 Yes, you quoted the conclusion, not the logical chain that led to that conclusion and I was not asking you to believe it. I was asking about a possible error in the logic that leads to this conclusion. starting with the audibility of a particular effect according to electrical engineering. Where exactly can there be a possible mistake? |