What do we hear when we change the direction of a wire?


Douglas Self wrote a devastating article about audio anomalies back in 1988. With all the necessary knowledge and measuring tools, he did not detect any supposedly audible changes in the electrical signal. Self and his colleagues were sure that they had proved the absence of anomalies in audio, but over the past 30 years, audio anomalies have not disappeared anywhere, at the same time the authority of science in the field of audio has increasingly become questioned. It's hard to believe, but science still cannot clearly answer the question of what electricity is and what sound is! (see article by A.J.Essien).

For your information: to make sure that no potentially audible changes in the electrical signal occur when we apply any "audio magic" to our gear, no super equipment is needed. The smallest step-change in amplitude that can be detected by ear is about 0.3dB for a pure tone. In more realistic situations it is 0.5 to 1.0dB'". This is about a 10% change. (Harris J.D.). At medium volume, the voltage amplitude at the output of the amplifier is approximately 10 volts, which means that the smallest audible difference in sound will be noticeable when the output voltage changes to 1 volt. Such an error is impossible not to notice even using a conventional voltmeter, but Self and his colleagues performed much more accurate measurements, including ones made directly on the music signal using Baxandall subtraction technique - they found no error even at this highest level.

As a result, we are faced with an apparently unsolvable problem: those of us who do not hear the sound of wires, relying on the authority of scientists, claim that audio anomalies are BS. However, people who confidently perceive this component of sound are forced to make another, the only possible conclusion in this situation: the electrical and acoustic signals contain some additional signal(s) that are still unknown to science, and which we perceive with a certain sixth sense.

If there are no electrical changes in the signal, then there are no acoustic changes, respectively, hearing does not participate in the perception of anomalies. What other options can there be?

Regards.
anton_stepichev
Electrical codes are have nothing to do with our understanding of physics changing. It is more about underestimating how stupid people can be, note comments in this thread. I also don't remember anything about rats chewing through wires in my quantum mechanics class.


Not all codes are changed because of the reasons you stated above. Some are changed because our understanding has changed.
 
Post removed 
So dletch2,

Which of the Ace Hardware ground fault interrupters do you recommend? 

The Cliff Clavin of bias methodology. As my grandad used to say: "bias smias". 
Post removed 

You’re not an engineer and you most certainly do not have any experience with electronics.
If you read his posts you will discover and i know it because i have discussed with him harshly some time but with excitation also, that he is one of the most competent in electronic audio here...

Now that is funny. 

I actually have read (some of) his posts. That's why I chose to not read any more of his posts.

In one post, he actually made the a claim that to implement feedback in a tube amplifier, you need to add "more tubes". If you have knowledge with electronic circuits nothing more needs be said. 

If you don't have, I understand that sometimes folks without subject matter expertise can be swayed by BS. So no condemnation from me. If you consider mr bullwinkle here competent, that's your choice and none of my business.

But please refrain from sharing your belief in his competence with me. I have a real concern I may rupture my spleen from laughter. I'm sure there is a lot we can share w/o including our resident "engineer" no?