Why is science just a starting point and not an end point?

There is no measuring device as sensitive as the human ear, among other things.

I will say this in another way...because it is not "true" written  like this...

The ears is "sensible" to meaning in sound....The ears is less sensible than some tool for this unidimensional accuracy by numbers, but for accuracy of meaning, which is multidimensional, nothing replace the ears...

Any tool live in ONE dimension which is the dimension of his use and parameters of his application...

The ears live in many dimension at the same time, which are all linked together by "meaning" for our consciousness....

No problem I don't listen to Bach.

I am not surprized.....

😊😊😊😁😁😁😊😊😊

I prefer Puccini.

Science explains the music and the gear completely

The gear yes ....

The music not at all...

Music is not only sound sorry....

No more than pitch perception is reducible to physical acoustic...

Read about psychoacoustic= physical acoustic and neurophysiology of perception ...

After that add music studies which is irreducible to any of the fields i just name....

Science is not a "superstition" or a belief in audio thread that explain anything and everything , it is a complex grid of fields studies without ANY alleged artificial unity save for his rigorous method.....

I prefer Puccini.

Then i apologize to you....

Puccini is a God in music....

My best to you....