Why is science just a starting point and not an end point?


Measurements are useful to verify specifications and identify any underlying issues that might be a concern. Test tones are used to show how equipment performs below audible levels but how music performs at listening levels is the deciding criteria. In that regard science fails miserably.

Why is it so?
pedroeb
If anyone cares to present any new evidence science would be more than happy to look through the telescope.
put a big chunk of shungite on your amplifier...

Put a quartz cristal on the same spot...

Listen and report your result comparing the two experiments...

This is science...

All ridicule are from zelots...

By the way no need of blindtest for this simple expêriment for now...

Invoking a blindtest BEFORE taking the experiment is stupidity...



Post removed 
That isnt science. In order for your experiments to be considered science certain protocols need to be followed.
Our gear in our room is not a laboratory...

If i claim something about shungite and quartz you MUST TRY IT YOURSELF...

 Claiming that no room is a laboratory is a common sense  affirmation that could not justify a refusal to experiment BY YOURSELF...

 Using scientific attitude could be possible out of a laboratory...

 We dont search for new scientific law here.... We discuss  child experiment in audio....


That isnt science. In order for your experiments to be considered science certain protocols need to be followed.

I’ll do your test. You try mine.

put a big chunk of cowshit on your amplifier...

Put a chocolate bar on the same spot...

Listen and report your result comparing the two experiments...
Insulting is not my way...

Take your shit where it belong and speak to the wall...

You just proved for all to see who you are....


Post removed