The question posed is a red herring. "Tube amplifiers sound better because of the euphonic distortions they add to the music." Where the Hell did you read or hear that?!
Bill Johnson always said he used whatever technology was available to make the best sounding electronics he could. He didn’t introduce his tube amps and pre-amp in 1970 (the first of the "modern" era) to offer audiophiles euphonically-distorted sound. He did it because at that time tubes provided him with the means to make products that reproduced music possessing the least distorted sound he could.
But all electronics add their own sound to the signal as it passes through them. Is tube distortion more euphonic than solid state distortion? Ralph Karsten (Atma-Sphere) postulates that solid state amps tend to produce high-order "odd" (the 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, etc.) harmonic distortion, tubes low-order "even" (2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, etc.) harmonic distortion. Since even-order distortion is more consonant to music than is odd-order (it is related, harmonically), it is less offensive to the brain. An amp producing even 1% hmd can sound "better" than an amp producing only 1/10%, IF the former’s hm distortion is low-order even, the latter’s high-order odd.
Roger Modjeski was of the opinion that inter-modulation distortion is a far more serious problem than is harmonic. The large amounts of negative feedback used in many solid state amps (to lower static hd, to lower the amp’s output impedance/raise it’s damping factor, and sometimes to make the circuit more stable) is a well known cause of inter-modulation distortion. Tube amps tend to use less nf., though the original Futterman OTL amps used huge amounts of it. Why Futterman did that---and why his amps still sounded great---was explained by Modjeski in his late, lamented Forum on AudioCircle. Though that Forum is dormant, Modjeski’s writings are still available for viewing on the AudioCircle site.
Bill Johnson always said he used whatever technology was available to make the best sounding electronics he could. He didn’t introduce his tube amps and pre-amp in 1970 (the first of the "modern" era) to offer audiophiles euphonically-distorted sound. He did it because at that time tubes provided him with the means to make products that reproduced music possessing the least distorted sound he could.
But all electronics add their own sound to the signal as it passes through them. Is tube distortion more euphonic than solid state distortion? Ralph Karsten (Atma-Sphere) postulates that solid state amps tend to produce high-order "odd" (the 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, etc.) harmonic distortion, tubes low-order "even" (2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, etc.) harmonic distortion. Since even-order distortion is more consonant to music than is odd-order (it is related, harmonically), it is less offensive to the brain. An amp producing even 1% hmd can sound "better" than an amp producing only 1/10%, IF the former’s hm distortion is low-order even, the latter’s high-order odd.
Roger Modjeski was of the opinion that inter-modulation distortion is a far more serious problem than is harmonic. The large amounts of negative feedback used in many solid state amps (to lower static hd, to lower the amp’s output impedance/raise it’s damping factor, and sometimes to make the circuit more stable) is a well known cause of inter-modulation distortion. Tube amps tend to use less nf., though the original Futterman OTL amps used huge amounts of it. Why Futterman did that---and why his amps still sounded great---was explained by Modjeski in his late, lamented Forum on AudioCircle. Though that Forum is dormant, Modjeski’s writings are still available for viewing on the AudioCircle site.