andy21,301 posts05-17-2021 4:51pmIn my day job, we wouldn’t trust any equipment. We actually have to characterize equipment to make sure they measure what they advertise.
Apparently, some here just google up some equipment and think they are good enough.
$10K for 0.05% accuracy out to 1MHz
I suppose some people have the data to back up 0.05% is good enough to measure human hearing. I don’t, but if you post something, you need to back up your claims.
That is sufficiency accuracy for a cable in audio.
Again, a statement without evidence or proof.
Interesting how some can so readily believe in what they search on google. :-)
**************************************************************
If you are unfamiliar with a topic, i.e. electronics manufacturing, then it is best to not comment. Nothing in audio is controlled to 0.05%. Not at the time of manufacturing, not over time, and not over temperature. With a cable, the impact would be volume (resistance, 0.05% is inaudible), or a filter frequency (0.05% is inaudible).
So yes, 0.05% is more than good enough for human hearing, or any practical manufacturing process.