Magico A3 vs. Wilson SabrinaX


Well, coming down the stretch, I can't find a on this forum comparing these 2 speakers. I listened to the SabrinaX, and found them "flat" somehow, hard to describe. Incredible definition and soundstage, but not much knack/dynamic. So, I'm wondering how they would compare to the Magico A3s that I haven't had a chance to listen to. I would be pairing these with a Pass XA25 which should be sufficient to drive them. Or is my "flat" experience simply unrealistic?
trackmoe
The Wilsons don’t hold a candle to the Magicos, but you need a trained ear to get it. They will not jump on you like some other speakers, but they will be a much better companion for the long run.
What's sad is that no one got my ebm tribute............
There weren't enough caps and exclamation points.
“What's sad is that no one got my ebm tribute............”

Oh I got it, but just moved along lol. 
Trackmoe,

low impedance speakers are harder to drive. Most amps struggle to put out a lot of current into low impedance loads and get hot in the process. 
The voltage out of the wall is constant So the amplifier has to put out more amps as the resistance drops. 
I=VR (amps=Voltage/Resistance) So amps go up when the resistance drops as Voltage is held constant. This also produces a lot of heat as current (amperes increase)

In your example of 91dv at 6 ohm vs 88 at 4 ohm the 88 db speaker takes twice the power and requires double the amps at the same time. The real kicker is the impedance changes as the driver moves in and out of its coil and does a job on the amplifier. 
1 volt / 6 ohms = 0.167 amps
1 volt / 4 ohms = 0.25 amps


The Sabrina looks hard to drive and will need a substantial amplifier based on stereophile’s measurements. But I am sure you can find someone with a low powered tube amp that is loving the combo... use your own judgment.