Any Thoughts On These?


high-amp
OP, just a little suggestion : ignore djones51's rant. The frequency response graph posted is fine, nothing to be too concerned about. The details of the measurement is not provided which is needed to make sense of what you see. The stated sensitivity is 88dB. Using this as a reference it will be seen that the response falls within the industry standard of +/- 3dB with the exception of the rise around 90Hz.

Also the response looks a bit spiky but without knowing what smoothing was used it can be ignored. There is much more to performance than a flat frequency response. Any competent speaker designer can flatten the response curve with the crossover by introducing more and more components which suck the life out of a speaker. You end up with a sound that is dynamically constipated. 

Appreciate too that when introducing the speaker into a domestic environment the response will be wildly different so insistence on a ruler flat response is pointless but looks good to people who shop by looking at specs. I prefer simple crossovers with the fewest parts which I find is always a better listening experience.

Of real concern is the impedance hovering around 3 ohms. This will demand an amp with lots of clean power, something that will double it's output into an impedance halved.
 Example: not all that common but is ideal.
 50W into 8 ohm
100W into 4 ohm
200W into 2 ohm

Thanks lemonhaze and to all that have responded here.

My wife and I finally heard the Totems with some upper end Naim separates and we couldn't hit the mute button fast enough! Not that they didn't sound good, they just weren't for us. Heard the Winds as well, same kind of "in your face" sound that just turned us off. Probably a lot to do with the venues. Room treatments would surely help as well.

Looking for a speaker that is a little more forgiving, so we have moved on from Totems for now.

Yup, listening is paramount. I don't know what country you are in but strongly recommend you try and have a listen to Richard Vandersteen's range which are the polar opposites to the Totems and their ilk. The smallest of the offerings is the Model 1, has been around for decades and can be found cheaply second hand. 

The Vandies are not your usual box speaker, have rave reviews and are IMO under-advertised. I mentioned the Model 1 because if you are unable to audition you could buy a second-hand pair to get a handle on the Vandersteen sound and if you don't like them they could be resold with little or no loss.

The modern style of speaker is generally focused on detail, detail, and detail and musicality seems to take a backseat which initially sounds impressive but long-term listening is fatiguing. Another to consider is Tannoy, especially the old and very large ones.

Good luck with your quest
https://www.soundstagenetwork.com/measurements/test_loudspeakers.htm

Link explains the measurements which might help in looking at any speaker. I personally don’t care for Vandersteen’s but I wasn’t trying to suggest a speaker just give some perspective on the one you liked. Try to listen to some Vandersteen you may like them. If I were giving a suggestion on a passive speaker I’d give Revel and Kef a listen as well.
End of rant.
lemonhaze - It’s funny you mention Vandersteens. I live a couple hours north of Seattle and made the trek to Advanced Audio Systems in Tacoma.
My wife and I listened to both The Treos and the 3As with great expectations and all I can say is that they were OK. We thought the Magnepan LRS ($650) sounded better
We have listened to many speakers that have great hype on these forums but frequently come away disappointed. Those likes, Spendor, Harbeth, Devore, Klipsch, Monitor Audio, Dynaudio, Vienna Acoustics, Focals, B&W to name a few. We are really trying our due diligence to listen to as many brands as we can without getting into the web ordered, in house demos offered by many manufactures. Being afraid of the shipping costs & restocking cost that could add up if you wish to return them.
What we have liked so far, Legacy Signature SEs, which can be custom built as actives, but a big ticket to try at home, especially if you want to return them! Triangle Australe EZs, Larsen 6.2s were OK (also nice with the fact they can be pushed up tight to the wall, as we have limited space to work with in our new digs). And lastly, djones51 recommendation of KEFs. We like the R11’s which only need to be 9" off the back wall.
My wife also liked the Martin Logan 60 xti’s as she thought they sounded a little more lively that the smoother R11’s. But these need to be at least 24" off the back wall.

djones51 - thanks for the link & your advice.