What do we hear when we change the direction of a wire?


Douglas Self wrote a devastating article about audio anomalies back in 1988. With all the necessary knowledge and measuring tools, he did not detect any supposedly audible changes in the electrical signal. Self and his colleagues were sure that they had proved the absence of anomalies in audio, but over the past 30 years, audio anomalies have not disappeared anywhere, at the same time the authority of science in the field of audio has increasingly become questioned. It's hard to believe, but science still cannot clearly answer the question of what electricity is and what sound is! (see article by A.J.Essien).

For your information: to make sure that no potentially audible changes in the electrical signal occur when we apply any "audio magic" to our gear, no super equipment is needed. The smallest step-change in amplitude that can be detected by ear is about 0.3dB for a pure tone. In more realistic situations it is 0.5 to 1.0dB'". This is about a 10% change. (Harris J.D.). At medium volume, the voltage amplitude at the output of the amplifier is approximately 10 volts, which means that the smallest audible difference in sound will be noticeable when the output voltage changes to 1 volt. Such an error is impossible not to notice even using a conventional voltmeter, but Self and his colleagues performed much more accurate measurements, including ones made directly on the music signal using Baxandall subtraction technique - they found no error even at this highest level.

As a result, we are faced with an apparently unsolvable problem: those of us who do not hear the sound of wires, relying on the authority of scientists, claim that audio anomalies are BS. However, people who confidently perceive this component of sound are forced to make another, the only possible conclusion in this situation: the electrical and acoustic signals contain some additional signal(s) that are still unknown to science, and which we perceive with a certain sixth sense.

If there are no electrical changes in the signal, then there are no acoustic changes, respectively, hearing does not participate in the perception of anomalies. What other options can there be?

Regards.
anton_stepichev
Great post!
The problem here is many who speak of science are techno cultist...

They think science= technology and technology =science ....

But a relation is not an equivalence and an equivalence is not an equality....



The problem here is many who speak of science are techno cultist...


I wouldn't go as far as calling them cultist. I see them as folks who's understanding of science isn't quite as advanced as what they believe it to be. 



this old chestnut of a thread is well deserving of a rightful and prompt demise
I wouldn’t go as far as calling them cultist. I see them as folks who’s understanding of science isn’t quite as advanced as what they believe it to be.
You are right...

I will not retract my words tough only because this universal movement work way beyond this thread, but applying it to some here is perhaps not the right context....You are right about that....


this old chestnut of a thread is well deserving of a rightful and prompt demise
I wonder why a valid asking question about an original experiment by the OP urge you so swiftly to appeal a censorship?

Is it your wonderful and powerful scientific knowing brain in action? Or is it the reptilian robotic brain reacting?

i dont know, being myself ignorant about the question asked here and about yourself....

I am curious in the 2 cases tough....And in general i try to apply censorship to my own language not to others and NOT to a complete thread...I am not perfect tough..... Are you?