Do I NEVER shut it off…?

@terry9 

Science and math is not political.  Going against science and math is political.

I'm tightly aligned with science and math.  With which group are you aligned?  

@bpoletti 

Your are correct that science and math are not political. What you wrote is against the accepted science, which was pretty much settled 20 years ago. The manner of your dogmatic assertion is political, and the antithesis of science.

Again, please leave your politics at home.

For the record, both of my advanced degrees are in math and science. It's Dr. if you like.

Accepted science doesn't mean it's true. Their are many scientists that disagree with the accepted science.

Not this science.

@terry9

"Accepted science" requires proof, not conjecture. Science and the scientific method REQUIRES healthy skepticism, not blind acceptance. (Think of how dangerous pharma could become without healthy skepticism and hard proof.)

Every man-made climate change prediction has failed to materialize. The only observable climate change is more minor than predictions for natural cyclical climate. And far less severe than the Hamptons and Florida Keys underwater by 2012, ice caps gone by 2014.

The last I read, less than 20% of ALL scientists believe man-made climate change exists. I can think of no mathematicians that have reviewed the published work that

So the conclusion can ONLY be that man-made climate change MUST be political since it is not supported by science or math.