@terry9
"Accepted science" requires proof, not conjecture. Science and the scientific method REQUIRES healthy skepticism, not blind acceptance. (Think of how dangerous pharma could become without healthy skepticism and hard proof.)
Every man-made climate change prediction has failed to materialize. The only observable climate change is more minor than predictions for natural cyclical climate. And far less severe than the Hamptons and Florida Keys underwater by 2012, ice caps gone by 2014.
The last I read, less than 20% of ALL scientists believe man-made climate change exists. I can think of no mathematicians that have reviewed the published work that
So the conclusion can ONLY be that man-made climate change MUST be political since it is not supported by science or math.
"Accepted science" requires proof, not conjecture. Science and the scientific method REQUIRES healthy skepticism, not blind acceptance. (Think of how dangerous pharma could become without healthy skepticism and hard proof.)
Every man-made climate change prediction has failed to materialize. The only observable climate change is more minor than predictions for natural cyclical climate. And far less severe than the Hamptons and Florida Keys underwater by 2012, ice caps gone by 2014.
The last I read, less than 20% of ALL scientists believe man-made climate change exists. I can think of no mathematicians that have reviewed the published work that
So the conclusion can ONLY be that man-made climate change MUST be political since it is not supported by science or math.