I can’t help but wonder how much further out of the range of human hearing a pair of supertweeters would have to be before they stopped improving on the sound of some of our audiophiles’ systems?
Is there no limit?
Is there no limit?
Townshend Maximum Supertweeters
Whatever limit there is, it has to be well above 20k. Probably above 40k and maybe twice that. This article explains why. http://www.townshendaudio.com/PDF/The-world-beyond-20kHz.pdf Part of the story is even though we don't hear such high frequencies as such, we do have specialized cells within the ear canal that do detect and respond to them. Instead of hearing it as a distinct tone it seems this is used to tell us information about the source and character of the sound. It makes sense because if a dry twig snaps or a leaf crumbles and you can tell from the sound it was a tiger and not a mouse, well the one you can eat but the other can eat you and so if you are not a pretty good audiophile hey you, out of the gene pool! Ideally you want to know this even without having to think about it. I have seen studies showing the response to seeing a snake is so fast it cannot possibly have time to travel up the neurons all the way to the Neo-cortex and back, the reflex had to have been triggered further down like in the brain stem. Down to where you literally do not even have time to think. So like that. |
Here's an interesting test if you own these supertweeters, or even another brand. I've seen several comments on this thread questioning the audibility of the supertweeters because of our limited ability to sense or hear very high frequency information. Well, one contributor here said that Max Townshend advised that he reverse the polarity be swapping the leads. I emailed Max and asked why. He said that it gives a feeling of airy spaciousness, which is pretty much the response I expected after many times hooking up interconnects incorrectly. I tried it today with music I know well; first correct phase, and then inverted. Inverted phase was clearly unfocused whereas correct phase sounded focused with clearly defined images. For me, this clearly proves the audibility of the contribution made by the supertweeters. I already knew what they were doing, but I think that this could be a good test for doubters. |
jasonbourne52631 posts06-14-2021 7:20amThe capacity of Humans for self-deception is apparently unlimited - Mr. Spock the Vulcan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ haha Richard Gray dug out from his stash room a pair of *super tweeter ribbons* Tag on rear is Pyramid Loudspeaker Corp, So i gave thema shot , to see if they out shoots his Magnovox 1963 tweeter horn which is IMHO probably the best tweeter ever made. So hooked them up, ha!, sounded so weak and thin, maybe 82db, These things from what I am told sold for like $4k a pair and some were actually sold. I wouldn;'t give a dime for em. I just got my AMT chinese Neo's in, $70 a pair, says 98db. HA! again lucky if these things are 90db. Thats 8 db off from what I was hoping. Again, the Magnovox horn tweeter is the benchmark, the gold standard, the top dawg to out shoot. . Honestly i really do not believe there is a tweeter that will surapss the Magnovox horn, made in 1963 right here in the USA. China can NOT make quality speakers, It is impossible, They do not have the engineering. But they sure make the world;'s finest opamps for digital. |