Yup, ya’ll are of course correct, it WAS Giles Martin, not Dhani. I didn’t pay much attention to those two reissues, so didn’t absorb that info deeply enough to recall it.
And I myself haven’t heard about Dhani being involved in the All Things Must Pass 50th, though I also don’t know that he didn’t. It’ll be interesting to find out who was involved in making decisions in regard to the new mixes, removal of the tacked-on reverb and echo, song selection, etc.
I haven’t decided how far I’m going to go---it’s being made available in everything from the basic/original 3-LP (and corresponding 2-CD) song line-up, all the way up to an 8-LP boxset. I’m leaving out the $500 ultra-deluxe package, which features a wooden crate. I just want the music.
At the time of ATMP’s initial release---shortly after McCartney’s first solo album, a very "small" recording---I found McCartney’s much more to my liking. More intimate and "inviting", ATMP too bombastic and, again, over-produced. Of course, by that time I---and a lot of others---had had my tastes permanently realigned by The Band’s 2nd s/t album, itself very small and intimate.
And I REALLY didn’t like Lennon’s first album, and still don’t. WAAAY yonder too personal; I’m not interested in your deep internal and intimate problems, John. Tell it to your shrink ;-) . And stop screaming, will ya?
But Ringo’s Nashville-recorded Beaucoup Of Blues album (his 2nd) I quite liked. A lot of my new-to-me favorite musicians accompanied Ringo playing gen-u-ine Country music (Ringo’s first love), guys heard on a lot of Dylan’s mid-60’s albums. Sure, their musical talent tended to make more obvious Ringo’s lack of singing talent, but that’s okay; I much prefer a great song sung by a mediocre singer to a mediocre song sung by a great singer. In the same way that the script/screenplay is more important to the making of a good movie than is the talent of the actors. Do I really have to say imo? ;-)
And I myself haven’t heard about Dhani being involved in the All Things Must Pass 50th, though I also don’t know that he didn’t. It’ll be interesting to find out who was involved in making decisions in regard to the new mixes, removal of the tacked-on reverb and echo, song selection, etc.
I haven’t decided how far I’m going to go---it’s being made available in everything from the basic/original 3-LP (and corresponding 2-CD) song line-up, all the way up to an 8-LP boxset. I’m leaving out the $500 ultra-deluxe package, which features a wooden crate. I just want the music.
At the time of ATMP’s initial release---shortly after McCartney’s first solo album, a very "small" recording---I found McCartney’s much more to my liking. More intimate and "inviting", ATMP too bombastic and, again, over-produced. Of course, by that time I---and a lot of others---had had my tastes permanently realigned by The Band’s 2nd s/t album, itself very small and intimate.
And I REALLY didn’t like Lennon’s first album, and still don’t. WAAAY yonder too personal; I’m not interested in your deep internal and intimate problems, John. Tell it to your shrink ;-) . And stop screaming, will ya?
But Ringo’s Nashville-recorded Beaucoup Of Blues album (his 2nd) I quite liked. A lot of my new-to-me favorite musicians accompanied Ringo playing gen-u-ine Country music (Ringo’s first love), guys heard on a lot of Dylan’s mid-60’s albums. Sure, their musical talent tended to make more obvious Ringo’s lack of singing talent, but that’s okay; I much prefer a great song sung by a mediocre singer to a mediocre song sung by a great singer. In the same way that the script/screenplay is more important to the making of a good movie than is the talent of the actors. Do I really have to say imo? ;-)