Poor grammar is disappointing and decidedly distracting in formal audio reviews.

personally, it doesn't bother me. i think poorly written reviews make the well written ones (admittedly rare!) stand out more. i'd agree some are too wordy, some are too nerdy, some are purple to the point of inducing nausea, some are apparently devoid of even a single coherent thought - but this is stereo equipment, not philosophy, so in reality the stakes are pretty low

It’a those damned cultural marxists. Stealing our commas, our grammar, our spelling, our women, our elections. And on the eve of our holiest day. Bastards.

It's always fun to have fun with homonyms and "proper spellings." As far as I'm concerned, Spell Check is the bane of the erudite. I can almost hear snickers coming from my spell check software. "Let's duh, duh, dumb it down!"

 “I can’t say I struggle to read any of them, not even the frankly unpleasantly dishonest Darko, but most are as dull as ditchwater.”
 @cd318 if you are going to impugn someone else’s integrity and character I think you risk being unpleasant and dishonest when you don’t offer any evidence to support your casual slanderous remark.

The last I checked with the powers that be moderating such subjects such as stereo equipment and recordings and personal preferences regarding such likes and like nots in a time when proper use of grammar has diminished as well as the use of cursive writing in such that the writer or reader of such prose in order to decipher the underlying meaning or theme that may go along with such a statement could really care less about such an atrocity of not punctuating properly when discussing the haves and have nots or the merits and demerits of the comma.