Poor grammar is disappointing and decidedly distracting in formal audio reviews.


I find the majority of formal audio reviews across numerous publications to be easy reads.  However, I can barely put together a coherent thought when reading anything by Jason Kennedy, editor of the-ear.net.  It is as if he does not understand the limitation of use of a comma.  Do the English really have that much of a different implementation of the english language versus Americans?  Does anybody else struggle to read certain editors' work?
mganga
To this I proclaim to all propinquitous purveyors of propriety. I intend to be a dotard ’till my dotage!
dekay,
I don't know what GMAFB is an acronym for, but I'm betting that it's not a compliment.
I guess that mentioning his religious affiliation on this occasion wasn't the best idea, but no harm done. That's why this is the USA.
...more fun and games with Anguished English after a whipping post or two from our desponders....

Having fits over arguments with Spell Check?
Well, you are not alone.  I'm with you, here to hawk my latest tome:

Howl 2 catsup frum no attentsion dureng englash gasses! (Furst Addiction)

It's free! Only a dollar....;)
(...pity, all those formal reviews I’ve read not properly attired in audiogarb.....let’s see....sweatpants & t-shirt?...nah. Shorts, no socks?....ehhh. Izod ’n ’crisp’ slacks? Better, I guess... )

The ’Full Monty’? Mmm, only with proper ’companionship’ *cue Up* ;)

Rare, perhaps....but done ’well done’ essential...
Nonoise!  A fit description of the mess we find our greater gaggle groping with! +42!

Democracy is So Passe'....

We really need a loose-minded mafia-stereotype to devolve us into the futility of the future, leading some truth deceiver sycophants to goosestep Proper...🤪