Poor grammar is disappointing and decidedly distracting in formal audio reviews.


I find the majority of formal audio reviews across numerous publications to be easy reads.  However, I can barely put together a coherent thought when reading anything by Jason Kennedy, editor of the-ear.net.  It is as if he does not understand the limitation of use of a comma.  Do the English really have that much of a different implementation of the english language versus Americans?  Does anybody else struggle to read certain editors' work?
mganga
"Also, as a Christian I intend to show that I put a great deal of thought into my articles and wish for them to be high quality."

GMAFB Doug.

DeKay
Yes but this was back before everyone was told they are a special snowflake, entitled to "their own truth" and that the best way of doing something isn’t really the best, you are just oppressing me, man! 
A perfect description of the alt right and the orange autocrat who led them. A party of feigned grievance, revenge and projection. The perfect antidote to a functioning democracy.

Trying to meet your recruitment quota, again?

By the way, happy surrender at Vicksburg day, where the Mississippi River runs again unvexed into the sea.

All the best,
Nonoise

To this I proclaim to all propinquitous purveyors of propriety. I intend to be a dotard ’till my dotage!
dekay,
I don't know what GMAFB is an acronym for, but I'm betting that it's not a compliment.
I guess that mentioning his religious affiliation on this occasion wasn't the best idea, but no harm done. That's why this is the USA.
...more fun and games with Anguished English after a whipping post or two from our desponders....

Having fits over arguments with Spell Check?
Well, you are not alone.  I'm with you, here to hawk my latest tome:

Howl 2 catsup frum no attentsion dureng englash gasses! (Furst Addiction)

It's free! Only a dollar....;)