2. misc-audio
  3. 167747-76462

Poor grammar is disappointing and decidedly distracting in formal audio reviews.

I find the majority of formal audio reviews across numerous publications to be easy reads.  However, I can barely put together a coherent thought when reading anything by Jason Kennedy, editor of the-ear.net.  It is as if he does not understand the limitation of use of a comma.  Do the English really have that much of a different implementation of the english language versus Americans?  Does anybody else struggle to read certain editors' work?
mganga
asvjerry's avatar
asvjerry
5,103 posts
 
(...pity, all those formal reviews I’ve read not properly attired in audiogarb.....let’s see....sweatpants & t-shirt?...nah. Shorts, no socks?....ehhh. Izod ’n ’crisp’ slacks? Better, I guess... )

The ’Full Monty’? Mmm, only with proper ’companionship’ *cue Up* ;)

Rare, perhaps....but done ’well done’ essential...
asvjerry's avatar
asvjerry
5,103 posts
 
Nonoise!  A fit description of the mess we find our greater gaggle groping with! +42!

Democracy is So Passe'....

We really need a loose-minded mafia-stereotype to devolve us into the futility of the future, leading some truth deceiver sycophants to goosestep Proper...🤪
td_dayton
320 posts
 
poor grammar and spelling > stuffy "writerly" posts that reek of effort. not only in hifi either. saw someone mentioned christopher hitchens - great example of a guy who could float until he got out of his depth. unfortunately for him (and us) that was on the subject of religion. anyway, i personally think darko's better in print, (but still love his channel - that room!) and art dudley was decent as well. ymmv
asvjerry's avatar
asvjerry
5,103 posts
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j26utuZUqMA
nonoise's avatar
nonoise
11,226 posts
 
avsjerry,
We came so close and it's not over yet.
More to discover