Is there a point of diminished returns with amps and Harbeth 30.1s?


I’m currently using Herron M1As with my 30.1s and I’ve upgraded the rest of my system (Aries/Fatboy/SUT/DL103r and Lamm pre and phono) and each upgrade has been VERY satisfying. So is it going to be worth spending $5000 or so on the used market to upgrade the Herrons? Any thoughts as to whether I’ve reached the apex of amp/speaker performace for the M30.1s?
dhcod
I too have the Orchid DAC and have tried several brand tubes in it.  Each having it's own sound signature.  Vibration isolation, cables and power conditioning would probably have a greater effect than a different amp of similar power output using all the same existing other components.
If I really had $5000 dollars to spend and being primarily a digital listener replacing the Orchid would be the biggest improvement for the dollar.
@cd318

@jjss49 ,

I was referring of course to published tests, ones that could be verified.

If you could successfully repeat your experiment I’m sure there would be an awful lot of interested parties willing to assist you in your groundbreaking demonstration.

No end of reviewers, magazines, websites would be very pleased to have just a morsel of evidence to back up their printed proclamations regarding sonic differences of amplifiers.

Heck, they might even start conducting their own.

Why not consider publicly sharing your groundbreaking research for others benefit?

I am following this thread with some interest.  It seems to me @jjss49 just did.  I am not sure if it is groundbreaking in any sense, but I think he just stated his findings from his comparison in his posting.
@whipsaw,

Perhaps I should have been clearer in stating that no one has been able to consistently identify sonic differences between 2 level matched solid state (sand) amps. 

With valve amps all bets are off, though even there it's been noticed that better measuring valve amps tend to sonically converge, not diverge, with their solid state counterparts. A straight wire with gain as Quad's Peter Walker once said. Didn't he also claim that he didn't need to listen to his amps? The measurements alone told him everything he needed to know.

And then there was the infamous Bob Carver Stereophile challenge which surely anyone with any amplifier interest should be familiar with.

https://www.bobcarvercorp.com/carver-challenge



@troidelover1499,

Fair enough, but don't you think such a groundbreaking discovery is worthy of a public repitition?

Just imagine how many magazine editors and reviewers would come racing to plant laurels around the head of this much welcomed harbinger of glad tidings?

Of course no designer of any digital product, cable or amplifier has ever claimed or even attempted to demonstrate the sonic superiority of their product, let alone subject it to a blind listening test.

I wonder why?

So why not go ahead, and make their day if you can?  I think we'd all be curious as to what exactly these so called claimed differences actually amount to.
 A straight wire with gain as Quad's Peter Walker once said. Didn't he also claim that he didn't need to listen to his amps? The measurements alone told him everything he needed to know.
This is a view that most amplifier designers disagree with, not to mention the vast majority of audiophiles. 

Measurements do not tell the whole story.
@whipsaw

i think we are better off not wasting our breath

published studies, measurements, ’verification’

sheesh... missing the point of what this pursuit is about it seems

enjoy the tunes, and onwards...