Poor grammar is disappointing and decidedly distracting in formal audio reviews.


I find the majority of formal audio reviews across numerous publications to be easy reads.  However, I can barely put together a coherent thought when reading anything by Jason Kennedy, editor of the-ear.net.  It is as if he does not understand the limitation of use of a comma.  Do the English really have that much of a different implementation of the english language versus Americans?  Does anybody else struggle to read certain editors' work?
mganga
Gregg's Grammar is great and germane if it does diminish disappointing and decidedly distracting writing, but what about annoying aggravating almost as awful alliteration?
@nonoise .....giving up in this currant molasses is not an opinion.
We need to press French until the drench of of intuition shakes the cord of exUBERance...!

(....where Did I leave that f'n lighter....?!....)

Happi Post Holidaze....Back to....whatever....
  • "Also, as a Christian, I intend to show that I put a great deal of thought into my articles and wish for them to be high quality."
I see nothing wrong with striving to follow a perfect being in the quest for excellence in all endeavors. How could that possibly be offensive to anyone?

I'm starting to think we may have a few "Karens" lurking here.

Frank
I laughed when I read the OP.  Jason Kennedy does indeed struggle with grammar and syntax.  It isn’t a British thing, however as I love reading the prose of Alan Sircom and Andrew Everard.
@bruce19,

Have you heard his podcast on snake oil?

Squirm City Arizona.

Nothing libellous about having an opinion. I couldn't care less about his butthurt.

Is there really any surprise that he blocks comments even on his own rather slimy channel?


https://darko.audio/2020/03/podcast-20-snake-oil/