Separate Amp for AV receiver

Alright, I've decided upgrade the speakers for my HT first, they are twenty+/-. I started with a new subwoofer. Just installed a new REL 7X. I also have a REL S/3 SHO for my two channel system, along with my 803 D3s, so I would like to go with both subs by connecting my Denon AVR4300 direct with the REL 7X, and using the "Longbow" REL wireless connection to the S/3 SHO. I can't seem to get them to pair although I've tried multiple times.
Anyhow the sound is much improved with the new 7X. My front speakers for my HT are NHT 2.5i, very efficient speaker. The rears are ceiling mounted Klipsch, don't know the mod. #, but they have three speakers facing down, front and rear. The upper clg. mtd. fronts are Boston Acoustics with front facing and rear facing speakers. The Center channel is Martin Logan Motion 50XT.
I think I'll keep the center channel, it's only a couple of years old, but change out the upper rears, and upper fronts first. 
Please advise, what do you think.
Thank you

You have quite an array of manufacturers there. The NHT’s show a 86db sensitivity which is not very efficient.
klipsch are usually in the hi 90’s which means they require more current than Klipsch.
the ML 50xt is rated at 94bd thats more sensitive requiring a little less juice.

i dont know what cgl.mtd means.

with this mismatch system im seeing why you are not happy. They all have a different signature. Power wise a nice 7ch 200watt per should do you well, its not going to sound bad, it just not gonna sound balanced.

if you research mastering suites for dolby atmos you will notice rooms with all the same speakers

That could be the issue, I'm keeping the Martin Logan though, what do you think about SVS?

I think the ML should stay. Now theoretically you should match that center with a L + R Martin Logan

Are you in a position for that kinda upgrade