Reed tonearms are very natural sounding. Good choice.
Analog upgrade: Luxman EQ-500 Phono preamp + Hana Umami Red Cartridge + REED 2A Tonearm
As the resident analogue system is being restructured, I am thinking of joining these 3 components:
Luxman EQ-500 Phono preamp + Hana Umami Red Cartridge + REED 2A Tonearm
I would like to know if anyone here knows and recommends them and if, by any chance, have already heard some of these components together (or not).
I have a Portuguese handcrafted turntable "Rui Borges UNO MKII", a Luxman class integrated amplifier (L-590AXMKII) and KEF R11 speakers.
On the phono issue I didn't even hesitate, as I knew the brand very well before, and it was in the top of my preferences. As for the cell, my doubt lies the most. Given her price level, can I choose better?
I've been knowing for yers the other versions of the brand and I'm a fan of the sound characteristics. But on this one, the top of the range, I never heard before and I don't know it at all. And of course, it will be impossible to demo it.
Anyone knows how could be the relationship between Hana cartridge's with the REED tonearm? That also worries me a little as I'm not a technical expert in this matter.
Someone who knows Hana Umami (since she is recent)?
What are the pros and cons of this cell?
I listen to everything from heavy rock to jazz, acoustics, voices, blues, classical.
Thankyou for your best advice
Cheers
Luxman EQ-500 Phono preamp + Hana Umami Red Cartridge + REED 2A Tonearm
I would like to know if anyone here knows and recommends them and if, by any chance, have already heard some of these components together (or not).
I have a Portuguese handcrafted turntable "Rui Borges UNO MKII", a Luxman class integrated amplifier (L-590AXMKII) and KEF R11 speakers.
On the phono issue I didn't even hesitate, as I knew the brand very well before, and it was in the top of my preferences. As for the cell, my doubt lies the most. Given her price level, can I choose better?
I've been knowing for yers the other versions of the brand and I'm a fan of the sound characteristics. But on this one, the top of the range, I never heard before and I don't know it at all. And of course, it will be impossible to demo it.
Anyone knows how could be the relationship between Hana cartridge's with the REED tonearm? That also worries me a little as I'm not a technical expert in this matter.
Someone who knows Hana Umami (since she is recent)?
What are the pros and cons of this cell?
I listen to everything from heavy rock to jazz, acoustics, voices, blues, classical.
Thankyou for your best advice
Cheers
- ...
- 23 posts total
grk, that opinion article you mentioned above (very well written by the way), does not apply at all to the possible differences between the impedances of the phono EQ-500 and the Hana Umami cartridge.
(https://www.mysonic.space/phono-cartridge-impedance-loading)
These differences (as I was almost sure) are entirely irrelevant and do not apply to the one mentioned by the opinion article author. I had already informed myself from knowledgeable people in the field that there would be no problem at all, which was confirmed by Luxman themselves. "The HANA-Umami quoted output of 0.4mV will be accommodated by the Luxman EQ-500 “low” MC input (0.18mV minimum sensitivity) required to drive EQ-500 to full output while preserving S/N ratio. HANA-Umami’s quoted internal impedance of 6 Ohms would be best partnered via the EQ-500’s “low” input impedance. (i.e. 2.5 Ohms) In this case, the 6 Ohm matching of HANA-Umami coil output impedance to “low” EQ-500 input impedance is within acceptable operational parameters.
While the HANA-Umami’s published specs calls for “recommended loading” of > 60 Ohms, this would not always apply. The 60+ Ohm recommendation would likely refer to “semiconductor/ fixed resistor based phono loading”. Along with its unique vacuum tube based circuitry, the EQ-500 features independent L+R channel “transformer based loading”, having unique electrical behaviors. The Luxman EQ-500 (internal) transformers can present ideal loading when they are at OR near the MC cartridge’s actual internal coil(s) impedance. In this case, 2.5 Ohms and 6 Ohms are very close and compatible.
The employed tonearm cabling and connectors will also provide slight/ additional series Ohms loading. (before signals reach the EQ-500 input, making the Ohms match even closer.) The various other front panel settings (Capacity, Impedance, etc.) on the EQ-500 are for use with Moving Magnet, Moving Iron, or Induced Magnet phono cartridge types. These do not factor into Moving Coil cartridge performance. While many things can be written on the Internet, what is provided to you here are direct comments/answers from the Luxman engineering staff in Japan." Thanks any way. |
Well if i was to drop 4 grand on a umami red i would want to hear it with every possible ohm load from 60 to 100. Proper ohm load will get the best out of any given Moving coil since it goes to synergy of associated phono cables. I have been reading many reviews and that cartridge is dialed in @ 2 grams, not 2.1 or 1.9. Order a Mint LP protractor for your arm and table, the umami when aligned dead nuts on is a killer cartridge. I just ordered one for my Phantom 2 / Oracle Delphi Mark Vl with 2nd generation mods. |
Protrator for cartridge alignment supplied with every Reed tonearm, more than enough to adjust any cartridge on Reed. This is excellent tonearm, I have 3p "12 inch cocobolo. I’m pretty sure you can find many cartridges at $4k or cheaper, I believe Hana is your choice not because some reviewer claimed this is the best. You can look for top LOMC models from Shelter, Dynavector, Audio-Technica, Phasemation ... At 5k you should look for AT ART-1000 because this is unique design. |
- 23 posts total