LSA Voyager GAN Amplifier

I have posted above that I am using the Conductor SE cable for the tests with the RAAL after you said the FrontRow was the differentiating factor. I am also using a single set of XLR's between the 07x and the amp being tested,  that would be the Voyager, AHB2, and Coda #8 The Optical streaming was the same when I tested using the CODA 07x preamp. I also now only have 1 amp connected to the 07x preamp at any given time.

************** APPLES-TO-APPLES COMPARISION **************

1) MY FRONT ROW CABLE IS DISCONNECTED
2) I AM ONLY CHANGING 1 COMPOINENT, THE AMP

**************************************************************************

I am not testing the Thiel because I do not want to move my amps around. The RAAL is more than enough to test for the sniff detail, likely the better option for this test.

In summary

The AHB2 at high gain and the Voyager were the same level of clarity on the SNIFF test. The high gain on the AHB2 sounded like the same volume level as the Voyager. I kept the CODA 07x preamp volume the same for both tests. The AHB2 has 3 gain settings, low, medium, high. I used the high setting after the low setting did not match the Voyager volume and also did not let me hear the sniff's.

The CODA #8 was not resolving the sniffs with the Conductor at a much higher CODA 07x volume level than the AHB2 and Voyager. The CODA comes in a distant 3rd.

So for the Voyager to be in the class of the AHB2 is pretty amazing. 

Do not get me wrong on the CODA. It is a magnificent sounding stack and likely the preferred for most A'gon posters. The AHB2 is still the king for me, but the Voyager is really sounding good now.

The former, KING OF THE RAAL, will make an appearance today if FedEx can deliver. It is the KRELL K-300i integrated amp. I won't be able to do an APPLES-TO-APPLES comparison and will use the built-tin DAC on the K-300i. I will also use the Gustard with 15 foot Benchmark XLR to the KRELL. In both cases, this will be a disadvantage to the KRELL.

Sorry, I did not see that you posted that you were using the Conductor for all tests with the RAAL......however, I just now looked quickly at your posts and did not see it mentioned. Glad you are just changing the amps and not the cable.

Sniff tests might be good for low level detail but we don’t listen to sniffs.....we listen to music. Sounds like the LSA is still a little bit "flat" on music? Will be interested in how much it improves with more burn in (probably not much) and of course, how much better it will be with mods.

Benchmark is a "testing for numbers" company. Their ranking of speaker connectors reflects their tests using resistance numbers....probably. I personally rank bananas as the worst sounding......the best is bare or tinned wire to wire (available only with my binding post bypass system).....then spade to bare wire.....then spade to super low mass binding posts (Furutech or WBT) and lastly bananas.....locking or not. I have never heard Speakons so cannot rank them......they are fairly low mass and simple....so they might be fine.

How about one of the owners of the Voyager posts a pic in their virtual system? There is a "rendered" version on LSA's own site, but not the actual amp in real life.

I got the KRELL K-300i back today and playing some of the same songs as with the other amps. My plans of selling this integrated are now halted. It sounds like the CODA #8 but a little smoother and more bass. I am going to keep the KRELL with my Thiels. I am using the Topping D90se DAC at the moment, this is a great DAC with the warm KRELL.

Is is better than the Voyager? It is not as fast sounding as the Voyager, less exciting, a much more relaxing sound, both have their place. That KRELL bass and smoothness is a winning combo. I have had the KRELL for about 10 months so it is nicely broken-in.