replace Mcintosh with Luxman

I own 2 Lux M900u’s as monos. I have experienced using one amp in stereo mode with good results with Wilson Sasha DAW. The Luxman musicality was there but the Bass control lacked until the other amp was introduced. I haven’t noticed any added noise or distortion, just better depth way better imaging,  gobs of endless reserve power and control of the low frequency that we all covet. oh that Bass!! I finally have heard the lower halves of my speakers but cabling is important. I spoke to a South Florida Magico and Luxman dealer , Suncoast Audio about the Magico and Lux Combo. He told me that he ran the Luxman m900u monos with the M6’s at the Florida audio show two years ago with outstanding results. 

m2team005 posts08-19-2021 5:06amRumors are that the M900u replacement, the M10x is about to be announced in Oct. M900u’s are sure to drop in price. Maybe hold off until then.

May I ask where did you get this rumor from?

Outstanding move to Luxman you`ll never look back. MC is very dark and veil the only thing I like about MAC is a vintage MAC tuner which I have MR73 I like a dark tuner.   I started out with MAC 1981 C28 preamp 2105 Power amp truely sucked sold it bought something that was much cheaper that just blew it away in SQ Dynaco Pat 5 preamp Dynaco 400 power amp saved over 2,000  Mc`s only a dinosaur name.  Enjoy you LUX.

May I ask where did you get this rumor from? 
 
The M10x is shown on the Luxman site (Japan) and my local dealer told me it will be in the US in October. 

I am a tube fanatic, so I like my Luxman CL1000 preamplifier better than the Luxman C900u's I tried out awhile ago. For my taste, Luxman products are wonderful, unless you want the McIntosh "house sound", whatever that is...