This says it all, the two that are trying their hardest to discredit this GaN by GaN Class-D have only their own interests in mind, and should look after their own interest and stop putting rubbish on things for their own monitory gains.Who is trying to discredit this amp? Its not me; you can't find a post on this thread wherein I am doing that. I have pointed out that its likely to have heat issues, but that does not take anything away from a product meant for evaluation.
Again:
It would help if more information was available. One thing seems apparent: While it might make 200 watts into 8 ohms it will not be able to do that for any length of time as there appears to be no provision for a heatsink (although it may be possible to heatsink it). Without a heatsink at 200 watts the output devices will simply overheat and fail- probably within a few seconds but maybe a minute or two.Note Amirm's comment 'different target for it'; clearly he is aware and understands the significance of this product being meant for evaluation):
IOW this kit really is for evaluation and for that I'm sure its just fine.
The eval unit unfortunately doesn’t show the improved performance due to different target for it. So best to look at commercial implementations that shoot for state of the art implementations.He seems to agree with me on this.