Well, @atmasphere read my previous post and responded appropriately while @georgehifi seemed to have ignored the point I was making, which is about audible benefits and sticks to cherry picking statistics which he feels must prove his point.
As I’ve mentioned like, forever: a measurement is not audible nor a preference. It’s just a number.
To be "better" to me it has to sound better. Otherwise it’s either equivalent or worse. We can argue that 0.01% THD is better than 0.03% THD, given equal harmonic distribution of the distortion, but you can’t prove one is audibly better since I assure you I cannot hear it.
And so, I have yet to hear evidence that any amplifier class is inherently superior all by itself. Even @atmasphere starts to get into feedback vs. non-feedback which occludes the entire discussion over amplifier classes. I might induce he’s saying feedback is more important than amplifier class. :)
I am going to state, categorically and forever that brand names are more important than amplifier class and that everyone who argues otherwise is a muggle.
As I’ve mentioned like, forever: a measurement is not audible nor a preference. It’s just a number.
To be "better" to me it has to sound better. Otherwise it’s either equivalent or worse. We can argue that 0.01% THD is better than 0.03% THD, given equal harmonic distribution of the distortion, but you can’t prove one is audibly better since I assure you I cannot hear it.
And so, I have yet to hear evidence that any amplifier class is inherently superior all by itself. Even @atmasphere starts to get into feedback vs. non-feedback which occludes the entire discussion over amplifier classes. I might induce he’s saying feedback is more important than amplifier class. :)
I am going to state, categorically and forever that brand names are more important than amplifier class and that everyone who argues otherwise is a muggle.