Esoteric DV-50S vs. UX-3SE Audio/Video quality

Anybody could help me decide if the extra cost for the UX-3SE is worth the investment.

pigtunia05-31-2006 2:22am

frankpiet Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 307 posts 06-23-2006 at 11:13am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Having used a stock and a modded DV-50 S for a while the upgrade from the stock DV-50 S to the UX-3 SE is quite significant. Modded DV-50 S betters stock UX-3 SE by quite a big margin BUT does not provide 1080i video processing - that´s why I choosed UX-3 SE - which will get a full US $ 2.790,00 RAM mod sooner or later.
dbld Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 297 posts 06-29-2006 at 02:31am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete FWIW, I have a DV-50 and have run it through an iScan HD+ video processor via its component outputs [interlaced]. I found this to be the best picture I ever got in my system [Sharp XV-Z10000U projector using the DVI input from the iScan]. I did try the DV-50S and was very disappointed with the video [and disappointed with the standard DV-50's video too] which is how I ended up with the iScan. Since all of that, I have had my DV-50 modded by The Upgrade Company and an SDI output installed. The SDI was NOT worth the money, but the Upgrade Company's work definitely was worth the money.
chichiuno Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 118 posts 06-29-2006 at 09:14am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Jp, oops!. I meant Dbld!, So how did it compared to a UX-3se? Am I missing something in your post?