Audiophile Priorities and Recent Topics


I'm increasingly fascinated by the number of threads that have been created lately by OP's who have joined over only the last 2 months with less than 30 posts that all seem related to the importance of wires and tweaks. While I'm not dismissing the notion that everything matters in hifi (including digital cable), it seems that these topics vastly overwhelm thread topics that clearly would have more influence to hifi audio sound such as discussions of the sonic characteristics of various amplifier topologies, the importance of simplifying the signal path, and identifying fantastic speaker/amplifier synergies, etc...

If some unsuspecting newbie were to stumble onto this forum they would likely come away thinking that a fuse or a piece of wire are the most important elements towards obtaining wonderful hifi sound. This is unfortunate. For example, my discovery of listening to a SET circuit years ago paired with speakers possessing a high and flat impedance greatly outshines any joy derived from identifying the finest digital cable produced by man. I'm simply questioning the hifi priorities that this forum seems to be obsessed with lately.

Is it just me?
128x128three_easy_payments
Three_easy_payments :

thx for the website shout out.

As inferred before, I built around a low cost, tube analog approach. As to speaker/amp synergy:

I started with the Dyna and a pair of Lafayette speakers. Moved up to a pair of Dyna MK IIIs, then Hafler mono blocs which were crap, back to the MK IIIs. Moved to a pair of Warfdales, then Altec 604Cs (1978), then the Futterman (1985), then Duntechs. The Duntechs and the Futtermans destroyed each other. Repaired the Futtermans, ditched the Duntechs, back to the 604Cs.

I recently had the Futtermans rebuilt by Jon Specter as triodes. He put in all new Jensen audio grade foil oil caps. I rebuild the 604s every 10 years. I asked Specter if I should change the impedance from 16 to 8, he said leave ‘em at 16, the Futtermans love efficiency. The Futtermans have been stable for 8 years now.

I started with building around the Dynas, got the 604Cs, loved ‘em, got the Futtermans and the Duntechs disaster led me to realize that the Altec/Futterman combo was a match made in heaven.

I know that Futterman/Quad is the classic combo, but I never liked the Quads.

I experimented with about a dozen cables in the 1990s/early 00s. To the extent that I heard a difference, I wondered if I was trying to hard to hear it. I should not have to make an effort to hear anything at $200 to $2000 per pair. Sorry! A waste of $s imho.

The only tweaks that I have done that made a difference is bolting the cabinet to a brick wall that the table sits on, and putting the Velodyne sub on springy rubber feet. That second one strikes me as counterintuitive but I guess that decoupling the sub from the building trumps resistance to movement: until then, the sub was turning the entire 3.5 story building into a subwoofer.
@unrecievedogma is a gem of a dude. i had a great conversation w him the other day. Love his website and giving back thru Vinyl Sunday, a global thing….

Out of curiosity I took a quick look at Robert Harley's well-known book "The Complete Guide to High-End Audio" to see what his guidance was on tweaks.  He discusses them in Chapter 15 (out of 16).  He indicates that these items can be used to address an "audiophiles' need to squeeze out those last bits of musical performance out of their systems."  He also says that you should not even think about these items before making sure you have optimized speaker positioning  and room acoustics first and having first built a solid foundation.

A few quotes I found interesting, while he did acknowledge that some accessories can certainly make improvements:

Other accessories can not only fail to improve the sound, but can actually degrade it. To make matters even more complicated, many accessories are completely worthless - nothing more than snake oil sold by less-than-honest promoters that have no effect on sound. 

Listen before you buy

It seems that Harley's priorities align well with mine and many others that have posted in this thread.  It's interesting that the Editor-in-Chief of The Absolute Sound used the term "snake oil".  I honestly didn't expect that.
Three_easy_payments:

”…many accessories are completely worthless…”

does he offer examples?  
@unreceiveddogma   

does he offer examples?  

Not too many, rather he states "I don't endorse every accessory described here - I simply report on what's available."

However he did include this about examples of indisputably worthless products:

Examples include an alligator clip , to be attached to a speaker cable to prevent the speaker's "gravitational influence" from affecting the audio signal.  Another claims to "energize" the electrons in an audio system with a combination of lithium salts and cobra venom.